Free Nonfatal Casedemo Incidence Rates - Arizona


File Size: 31.5 kB
Pages: 3
Date: November 27, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: Arizona
Category: Workers Compensation
Author: ICA
Word Count: 601 Words, 3,952 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

http://www.ica.state.az.us/docs/bls/NFOI_casedemo-IR_2006.pdf

Download Nonfatal Casedemo Incidence Rates ( 31.5 kB)


Preview Nonfatal Casedemo Incidence Rates
Table 2. Incidence rates1of nonfatal occupational injuries and illnesses involving days away from work2 by selected worker and case characteristics and industry, Arizona, private industry, 2006 Characteristic Private industry3,4,5 Total

Total: Number of days away from work: Cases involving 1 day Cases involving 2 days Cases involving 3-5 days Cases involving 6-10 days Cases involving 11-20 days Cases involving 21-30 days Cases involving 31 or more days Nature of injury, illness: Sprains, strains Fractures Cuts, lacerations, punctures Bruises, contusions Heat burns Chemical burns Amputations Carpal tunnel syndrome Tendonitis Multiple traumatic injuries With fractures With sprains Soreness, Pain Back pain All other Part of body affected: Head Eye Neck Trunk Back Shoulder Upper extremities Finger Hand, except finger Wrist Lower extremities Knee Foot, toe Body systems Multiple All other

128.2

128.2

22.9 14.0 26.7 18.8 15.7 8.0 22.1

22.9 14.0 26.7 18.8 15.7 8.0 22.1

51.8 10.1 15.6 11.2 2.7 1.2 0.5 0.9 -4.5 1.6 1.5 10.8 2.6 18.7

51.8 10.1 15.6 11.2 2.7 1.2 0.5 0.9 -4.5 1.6 1.5 10.8 2.6 18.7

11.0 6.0 1.8 38.3 23.7 6.3 32.7 11.1 5.7 6.3 28.9 11.0 5.7 3.2 12.1 0.2

11.0 6.0 1.8 38.3 23.7 6.3 32.7 11.1 5.7 6.3 28.9 11.0 5.7 3.2 12.1 0.2

See footnotes at end of table. Source of injury, illness: Chemicals, chemical products Containers Furniture, fixtures Machinery Parts and materials Worker motion or position Floor, ground surfaces Handtools Vehicles Health care patient All other Event or exposure: Contact with object, equipment Struck by object Struck against object Caught in object, equipment, materia Fall to lower level Fall on same level Slips, trips Overexertion Overexertion in lifting Repetitive motion Exposed to harmful substance Transportation accidents Fires, explosions Assault, violent act by person by other All other 37.7 21.7 7.4 3.7 11.4 13.9 1.5 31.0 19.4 2.2 7.9 8.4 0.1 2.2 1.1 1.0 11.9 37.7 21.7 7.4 3.7 11.4 13.9 1.5 31.0 19.4 2.2 7.9 8.4 0.1 2.2 1.1 1.0 11.9 3.9 16.1 4.2 9.2 14.7 14.3 24.2 7.8 12.5 2.9 18.4 3.9 16.1 4.2 9.2 14.7 14.3 24.2 7.8 12.5 2.9 18.4

1

Incidence rates represent the number of injuries and illnesses per 10,000 full-time workers and were calculated as:

(N / EH) X 20,000,000 where,

N EH 20,000,000
2 3 4

= number of injuries and illnesses, = total hours worked by all employees during the calendar year, = base for 10,000 full-time equivalent workers (working 40 hours per week, 50 weeks per year).

Days away from work cases include those that result in days away from work with or without job transfer or restriction. Excludes farms with fewer than 11 employees. Data for mining (Sector 21 in the North American Industry Classification System -- United States, 2002) include establishments not governed by

the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) rules and reporting, such as those in oil and gas extraction and related support activities. Data for mining operators in coal, metal, and nonmetal mining are provided to BLS by the Mine Safety and Health Administration, U.S. Department of Labor. Independent mining contractors are excluded from the coal, metal, and nonmetal mining industries. These data do not reflect the changes the Occupational Safety and Health Administration made to its recordkeeping requirements effective January 1, 2002; therefore estimates for these industries are not comparable to estimates in other industries.
5

Data for employers in rail transportation are provided to BLS by the Federal Railroad Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation.

NOTE: Dashes indicate data that do not meet publication guidelines. The scientifically selected probability sample used in each year was one of many possible samples, each of which could have produced different estimates. A measure of sampling variability for each estimate is available upon request.

SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor, November 27, 2007