Free Order on Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law - District Court of Colorado - Colorado


File Size: 8.4 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Colorado
Category: District Court of Colorado
Author: unknown
Word Count: 239 Words, 1,636 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cod/9070/244.pdf

Download Order on Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law - District Court of Colorado ( 8.4 kB)


Preview Order on Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law - District Court of Colorado
Case 1:01-cv-02056-JLK

Document 244

Filed 09/11/2007

Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 01-cv-02056-JLK UNITED STATES AVIATION UNDERWRITERS, INC., a New York corporation; PAUL LEADABRAND, an Idaho resident; and JEFLYN AVIATION, INC. dba ACCESS AIR, an Idaho corporation, Plaintiff, v. PILATUS BUSINESS AIRCRAFT, LTD, a Colorado corporation; PILATUS FLUGZEUGWERKE AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT, a Swiss corporation; PILATUS AIRCRAFT, LTD, a Swiss corporation; PRATT & WHITNEY CANADA, INC.; and DOES 1 through 500, Inclusive, Defendants. ________________________________________________________________________ ORDER ________________________________________________________________________ KANE, J. This aviation products liability action was tried to a jury in June, resulting in a mixed but favorable verdict for Plaintiffs. It is before me now on Defendant Pratt & Whitney Canada's Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law or for New Trial (Doc. 214), together with the Pilatus Defendants' Motion for Joinder therein (Doc. 215), which is GRANTED. After careful consideration of each of Pratt & Whitney's assertions of error in the jury's findings, I reject the contention that any of the jury's verdict was supported by legally insufficient evidence and DENY the Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law.

Case 1:01-cv-02056-JLK

Document 244

Filed 09/11/2007

Page 2 of 2

I also decline to exercise my discretion to order a new trial. Further challenges to the verdict must be made to the Court of Appeals.

Dated September 11, 2007.

s/John L. Kane SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

2