Free Exhibit List - District Court of Colorado - Colorado

Case 1:01-cv-01690-WDM-MJW

Document 143

Filed 11/28/2005

Page 1 of 13 Page 1

JUDGE WALKER MILLER PLAINTIFF CONAIL CROSS' EXHIBIT LIST CASE CAPTION Conail Cross v. The Home Depot
List Plaintif f 's Exhibits by Number (1, 2, 3, etc.) and Def endant's Exhibits by capital D f ollowed by number (D1, D2, D3, etc.)

CASE NUMBER 01-WM-1690

Designation

Description

Of f er

Stip.

In

Out

Rul. Res.

Comment

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20.

Plaintiff's Employment Application Plaintiff's Resume 12/5/88 Employee Action Notice 3/6/89 Employee Action Notice 8/26/89 Employee Action Notice 3/5/90 Employee Action Notice M erit Badge Certificate 9/3/90 Employee Action Notice 11/21/90 Employee Action Notice 4/1/91 Employee Action Notice 5/6/91 Employee Action Notice 7/20/92 Employee Action Notice 8/3/92 Employee Action Notice 9/7/92 Employee Action Notice 11/9/92 Employee Action Notice 3/4/93 Relocation Preference Form 3/29/93 Employee Action Notice 7/26/93 Employee Action Notice 3/28/94 Employee Action Notice 5/5/94 Acknowledgment: Harassment/Discrimination Training

X X X X WITHDRAWN BY PLAINTIFF WITHDRAWN BY PLAINTIFF WITHDRAWN BY PLAINTIFF WITHDRAWN BY PLAINTIFF X WITHDRAWN BY PLAINTIFF WITHDRAWN BY PLAINTIFF X WITHDRAWN BY PLAINTIFF X X WITHDRAWN BY PLAINTIFF X X X X

Defendant's Objections are based on the following reasons: R = Relevance; H = Hearsay; A = Authenticity; F = Foundation; BE = Best Evidence; S = Rule 408 Settlement Offer; ND = Not Disclosed

Case 1:01-cv-01690-WDM-MJW

Document 143

Filed 11/28/2005

Page 2 of 13 Page 2

Designation

Description

Of f er

Stip.

In

Out

Rul. Res.

Comment

21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. 44. 45. 46. 47.

2/27/95 Employee Action Notice 3/8/95 Relocation Notice 4/28/95 Relocation Notice 5/12/95 Acknowledgment: Harassment/Discrimination Training 6/19/95 Employee Action Notice 9/1/99 Employee Action Notice 3/1/99 Employee Action Notice 1/4/99 Employee Action Notice 9/7/98 Employee Action Notice 11/29/88 Performance Appraisal 3/2/89 Performance Appraisal 6/26/89 Performance Appraisal 8/19/89 Performance Appraisal 2/18/90 Performance Appraisal 9/24/90 Performance Appraisal "M y Goals With Home Depot" 11/14/90 Performance Appraisal 4/10/91 Performance Appraisal 10/14/91 Performance Appraisal 1/14/92 Performance Appraisal 7/30/92 Performance Appraisal 4/2/93 Performance Appraisal 9/3/93 M id-Year Review 3/26/94 Performance Appraisal 9/3/94 M id-Year Review 2/2/95 Relocation Preferences 2/12/95 Performance Appraisal

X X X X X X X X X X WITHDRAWN BY PLAINTIFF WITHDRAWN BY PLAINTIFF X WITHDRAWN BY PLAINTIFF X R X X WITHDRAWN BY PLAINTIFF X X X X X X X X

Defendant's Objections are based on the following reasons: R = Relevance; H = Hearsay; A = Authenticity; F = Foundation; BE = Best Evidence; S = Rule 408 Settlement Offer; ND = Not Disclosed

Case 1:01-cv-01690-WDM-MJW

Document 143

Filed 11/28/2005

Page 3 of 13 Page 3

Designation

Description

Of f er

Stip.

In

Out

Rul. Res.

Comment

48. 49. 50. 51. 52. 53. 54. 55. 56. 57. 58. 59. 60. 61. 62. 63. 64. 65. 66. 67. 68. 69. 70. 71.

2/27/96 Performance Appraisal 2/28/97 Performance Appraisal 2/12/98 Performance Appraisal 8/25/98 M id-Year Review 2/5/99 Performance Appraisal 12/1/99 M id-Year Review 2/15/2000 Performance Appraisal 8/88 Employee Handbook 8/90 Orientation Guide/Handbook 8/92 Orientation Guide/Handbook 1/93 Orientation Guide/Handbook 1/95 Associate Orientation Guide 1/96 Associate Orientation Guide 2/97 Associate Orientation Guide 5/97 Store Support Associate Orientation 1/98 Associate Orientation Guide 5/98 Store Support Associate Orientation Guide 1/99 Associate Orientation Guide 1/00 Associate Orientation Guide SOP 01-63 (3/16/01): Benefit Programs SOP 01-24 (8/31/99): Rules Of Conduct SOP 01-63 (6/18/99): Benefit Programs SOP 01-33 (3/15/99): Associate Counseling And Reviews SOP 01-52 (3/15/99): Internal M oves/Promotions

X X X X X X X X WITHDRAWN BY PLAINTIFF WITHDRAWN BY PLAINTIFF WITHDRAWN BY PLAINTIFF WITHDRAWN BY PLAINTIFF WITHDRAWN BY PLAINTIFF WITHDRAWN BY PLAINTIFF WITHDRAWN BY PLAINTIFF X WITHDRAWN BY PLAINTIFF R (portions) R (portions) R R, F R R X

Defendant's Objections are based on the following reasons: R = Relevance; H = Hearsay; A = Authenticity; F = Foundation; BE = Best Evidence; S = Rule 408 Settlement Offer; ND = Not Disclosed

Case 1:01-cv-01690-WDM-MJW

Document 143

Filed 11/28/2005

Page 4 of 13 Page 4

Designation

Description

Of f er

Stip.

In

Out

Rul. Res.

Comment

72. 73. 74. 75. 76. 77. 78. 79. 80. 81. 82. 83. 84. 85. 86. 87.

Training Requirements (3/15/99) Bates Stamp 799-804 SOP 01-21 (3/115/99): Workplace Issues SOP 01-24 (4/16/01): Rules Of Conduct SOP 01-21 (11/6/98): Workplace Issues SOP 01-42 (2/6/98): Leave Of Absence SOP 01-33 (1/9/98): Associate Counseling And Reviews SOP 01-81: Store M anagement Bonus Plan SOP 01-02 (3/14/99): Applying Or Registering For Positions 2001 Proxy statement And Notice Of Stockholder's M eeting 1999 Proxy Statement And Notice Of Stockholder's M eeting 3/27/2000 Letter from Arthur Blank in 1999 Social Responsibility Report 1/4/99 M anagement Application Tracking Form 3/22/99 M anagement Application Tracking Form 4/27/99 M anagement Application Tracking Form 8/16/99 M anagement Application Tracking Form 1/11/00 M anagement Application Tracking Form

X R, F R, F R, F X R, F R, F X R, F, H R, F, H R, F, H X X X X R, F

Defendant's Objections are based on the following reasons: R = Relevance; H = Hearsay; A = Authenticity; F = Foundation; BE = Best Evidence; S = Rule 408 Settlement Offer; ND = Not Disclosed

Case 1:01-cv-01690-WDM-MJW

Document 143

Filed 11/28/2005

Page 5 of 13 Page 5

Designation

Description

Of f er

Stip.

In

Out

Rul. Res.

Comment

88. 89. 90. 91. 92. 93. 94. 95. 96. 97. 98. 99. 100. 101. 102. 103. 104. 101a. 102b.

M anagement Application Tracking Form for Stores 1510 and 1511 Lempereur's 12/2/99 9 Box Grid Lempereur's 4/13/99 9 Box Grid Lempereur's 7/30/99 9 Box Grid-Bate Stamp 3213 Lempereur's 7/30/99 9 Box Grid-Bate Stamp 3207 Lempereur's 7/30/99 9 Box Grid-Bate Stamp 3210 Alfred's 2/17/99 9 Box Grid Alfred's 7/20/99 9 Box Grid Alfred's 12/2/99 9 Box Grid Ash's 7/30/99 9 Box Grid 6/29/00 Succession Planning Update Worksheet For Plaintiff 9/29/98 Letter from Whited to Plaintiff Job Profile: Supervisor/M anager 2/19/99 HR M emo from Lani Dorsey Re: ASM Succession Planning 9/24/99 M anaging Inclusion Seminar: Certificate Grid Listing 18 HD Stores: Bate Stamp 74 Brochure: "Your Career At Home Depot Statement Of Goals: (Plaintiff in Store #685) Conail Cross' Goals for 1998

R, F X X A, F, H X A, F, H X X X X A, F, R R, A, F, H R, F R, F X A, F, R X A, R A, R

Defendant's Objections are based on the following reasons: R = Relevance; H = Hearsay; A = Authenticity; F = Foundation; BE = Best Evidence; S = Rule 408 Settlement Offer; ND = Not Disclosed

Case 1:01-cv-01690-WDM-MJW

Document 143

Filed 11/28/2005

Page 6 of 13 Page 6

Designation

Description

Of f er

Stip.

In

Out

Rul. Res.

Comment

102c. 103a. 104a. 105. 106. 107. 108. 109. 110. 111. 112. 113. 114. 115. 116. 117. 118.

9/2/94 Warner Hilton "State Of The Future" M eeting Notice 6/99 Associate Development Guide Plaintiff's Handwritten Notes/Diaries Population By Race: Denver M etro Area Colorado Springs Fact Sheet: Re; Ethnic/Racial Composition EEO Employer Information Report-2000 1999 Social Responsibility Report: re:Source 1992 Annual Report 2000 Social Responsibility Report: Recruiting In Communities 2000 Annual Report Consent Decree: Case No. C94-4335 SI; C95-2182 SI 2001 Social Responsibility Report: Personal Growth Defendant's Response to Interrogatories Plaintiff's Handwritten Diary Penny Allen Work Application and Appraisals: Bate Stamps 1337, 1339-1345 Robert Bertram Work Application and Appraisals: Bate Stamps 167-177 Norma Bowman Work Application and Appraisals: Bate Stamps 178, 1255, 12581262

F, H, R X A, H, R, BE, ND F, A, H, R, ND F, A, H, R, ND F, R, H, ND F, R, H, ND F, R, H, ND F, R, H, ND F, R, H, ND F, R, H, S , ND F, R, H, ND F, R A, H, R, BE, ND R, F, H R, F, H F, H

Defendant's Objections are based on the following reasons: R = Relevance; H = Hearsay; A = Authenticity; F = Foundation; BE = Best Evidence; S = Rule 408 Settlement Offer; ND = Not Disclosed

Case 1:01-cv-01690-WDM-MJW

Document 143

Filed 11/28/2005

Page 7 of 13 Page 7

Designation

Description

Of f er

Stip.

In

Out

Rul. Res.

Comment

119. 120. 121. 122. 123. 124. 125. 126. 127. 128. 129. 130.

John Brogan Work Application and Appraisals: Bate Stamps 188-191, 194195, 1329,1332-1336 Jeff Crow Work Application and Appraisals: Bate Stamps 3185, 31783182, 1314 Brian Dodge Work Application and Appraisals: Bate Stamps 196-202 Lisa Haney Work Application and Appraisals: Bate Stamps 203 Frank Harris Work Application and Appraisals: Bate Stamps 214, 1353-1357 Hector Hernandez Work Application and Appraisals: Bate Stamps 1286-1287, 1289-1295, 224, 153-156 M ike (John) Hill Work Application and Appraisals: Bate Stamps 1246-1253 Bill Keenan Work Application and Appraisals: Bate Stamps 1235, 123712244 Jim M artin Work Application and Appraisals: Bate Stamps 1281, 1282-1284 (b) Catherine M urray Work Application and Appraisals: Bate Stamps 1317-1327 Eric Rodriguez Work Application and Appraisals: Bate Stamps 1268, 1270-1279 Pat Swaney Work Application and Appraisals: Bate Stamps 281-286

R, F, H R, F, H R, F, H R , F, H R , F, H R, F, H R, F, H R , F, H R , F, H R , F, H R , F, H R , F, H

Defendant's Objections are based on the following reasons: R = Relevance; H = Hearsay; A = Authenticity; F = Foundation; BE = Best Evidence; S = Rule 408 Settlement Offer; ND = Not Disclosed

Case 1:01-cv-01690-WDM-MJW

Document 143

Filed 11/28/2005

Page 8 of 13 Page 8

Designation

Description

Of f er

Stip.

In

Out

Rul. Res.

Comment

131. 132. 133. 134. 135. 136. 137. 138. 139. 140. 141. 142. 143. 144. 145. 146.

Steve Tyler Work Application and Appraisals: Bate Stamps 1297, 12991306, 157-160, 1308-1309 3/25/99 District M anager Performance Appraisal For Lempereur 10/2/95 Employee Notice for Lempereur 3/28/95 warning for Lempereur re: late reviews 11/16/99 Associate Performance Notice for Lempereur 8/23/01 Associate Action NoticeLempereur 3/21/94 Performance AppraisalLempereur 9/8/94 M id-Year Review-Lempereur 3/9/95 Performance Appraisal: Lempereur 3/15/01 Performance AppraisalLempereur 2/14/96 Performance AppraisalLempereur 8/23/95 M id-Year Review-Lempereur 11/14/94 Employee Action NoticeLempereur 10/93 Employee Action NoticeLempereur 3/29/93 Employee Action NoticeLempereur 3/18/93 Performance AppraisalLempereur

F, H F, R, H F, R, H F, R, H F, R, H F, R, H F, R, H F, R, H F, R, H F, R, H F, R, H F, R, H F, R, H F, R, H F, R, H F, R, H

Defendant's Objections are based on the following reasons: R = Relevance; H = Hearsay; A = Authenticity; F = Foundation; BE = Best Evidence; S = Rule 408 Settlement Offer; ND = Not Disclosed

Case 1:01-cv-01690-WDM-MJW

Document 143

Filed 11/28/2005

Page 9 of 13 Page 9

Designation

Description

Of f er

Stip.

In

Out

Rul. Res.

Comment

147. 148. 149. 150. 151. 152. 153. 154. 155. 156. 157. 158. 159. 160. 161. 162. 163. 164.

3/9/92 Performance Appraisal-Lempereur 10/31/90 Performance AppraisalLempereur 4/9/90 Employee Action NoticeLempereur 2/12/90 Employee Action NoticeLempereur 3/30/98 Performance AppraisalLempereur Hector Hernandez EEOC Complaint 1/5/01 and 1/8/01 letters by Jim Parsons Plaintiff's 2/10/00 EEOC Charge Plaintiff's 2/10/00 Charge Questionnaire with Attachments 4/18/01 EEOC Determination Letter re: Plaintiff's charge Notice Of Right To Sue Letter to Plaintiff from EEOC Plaintiff's Response to Request For Information 4/18/95 Interoffice M emo from Paul Rodriguez re: Store 1504 3/22/00 letter from Defendant to EEOC 9/11/99 letter from Plaintiff to Strout 9/11/99 letter from Plaintiff to O'Hagan Letter from Plaintiff to Strout Defendant's Response to EEOC Request For Information, Bate Stamp 306-323

F, R, H F, R, H F, R, H F, R, H F, R, H H, F, R, ND H, F, R, A, ND H, R H, R H, F, R H, F, R H, F, R R, H, F, A (portions) H, F, R H, F, R H, F, R H, F, R H, F, R

Defendant's Objections are based on the following reasons: R = Relevance; H = Hearsay; A = Authenticity; F = Foundation; BE = Best Evidence; S = Rule 408 Settlement Offer; ND = Not Disclosed

Case 1:01-cv-01690-WDM-MJW

Document 143

Filed 11/28/2005

Page 10 of 13 Page 10

Designation

Description

Of f er

Stip.

In

Out

Rul. Res.

Comment

165. 166. 167. 168. 169. 170. 171. 172. 173. 174. 175. 176. 177. 178. 179. 180. 181. 182.

5/24/01 letter from Defendant to EEOC Defendant's Response to EEOC Request for Information, Bate Stamp 121-144 Chronological Work History Of Store M angers Promoted from 1/99 IRS Form 1040: 1997-2001 for Plaintiff W-2's: 1998-2001 2000 Benefits Summary 7/26/99 Closing Instructions for Purchase of Residence 5/1/02 Loan History from Countrywide Home Loans 10/21/99 Truth In Lending Statement Payment/Bonus Histories Confirmation of Payment from Future Builder on 10/15/01 Options Account History Salary Report for ASM 's-Bate Stamp 1452 Pacey Economics Group-Appraisal Of Loss M edical Records for Plaintiff: Dr. Thomas J. Bartlett M edical Records for Plaintiff: Dr. Richard M arciniak M edical Records for Plaintiff: Dr. Victor Neufeld M et Life Disability Claim Package

S , R, F, H F, R, H F, R, H R R A, H, F, R, ND A, H, F, R, ND A, H, F, R, ND A, H, F, R, ND A, H, R, F, ND A, H, R, F, ND A, F, R, H, ND S , R, F H, F, R X X X X

Defendant's Objections are based on the following reasons: R = Relevance; H = Hearsay; A = Authenticity; F = Foundation; BE = Best Evidence; S = Rule 408 Settlement Offer; ND = Not Disclosed

Case 1:01-cv-01690-WDM-MJW

Document 143

Filed 11/28/2005

Page 11 of 13 Page 11

Designation

Description

Of f er

Stip.

In

Out

Rul. Res.

Comment

183. 184. 185. 186. 187. 188. 189. 190. 191. 192. 193. 194. 195. 196.

3/30/00 medical eval: Dr. Anita Lane 4/28/00 Report of Colonoscopy by Dr. Wenham 5/15/00 M edical Leave Order 9/20/00 M edical Leave Order 7/6/01 M edical Leave Order Report of M edications EEOC File: Plaintiff v. Defendant EEOC File: Sheri Gibson v. Defendant EEOC File: Hector Hernandez v. Defendant 12/10/02 Notice of Leave Expiration from Home Depot 12/10/02 Employment Benefits Confirmation of Enrollment from Home Depot 12/21/02 Employment Benefits Billing Notice from Home Depot 1/13/03 Employment Benefits Billing Notice Plaintiff's Federal Tax Returns: 2002, 2003, 2004

X X X X X X Defendant reserves its objections until these documents are produced or identified. Defendant reserves its objections until these documents are produced or identified. Defendant reserves its objections until these documents are produced or identified. X R, F R, F Defendant reserves its objections until these documents are produced or identified. R, F

Defendant's Objections are based on the following reasons: R = Relevance; H = Hearsay; A = Authenticity; F = Foundation; BE = Best Evidence; S = Rule 408 Settlement Offer; ND = Not Disclosed

Case 1:01-cv-01690-WDM-MJW

Document 143

Filed 11/28/2005

Page 12 of 13 Page 12

Designation

Description

Of f er

Stip.

In

Out

Rul. Res.

Comment

197. 198. 199. 200. 201. 202.

Plaintiff's State Tax Returns: 2002, 2003, 2004 October 13, 2005 Updated Economic Loss Report from Pacey Economics Group 1/20/94 Letter from Thomas P. Brown IV to Cross re: Calderon v. Home Depot et al. Page 1 of Cross' Responses to Form Interrogatories, Case No. PC011492Y, served 4/4/94 California Form Interrogatories, 1987 and 2002 Judicial Council Forms 7/22/94 cover letter from Cross to Hess and Settlement and General Release re: Cross v. M ontgomery Ward Records memorializing employment search 9/10/93 Home Depot Employee Notice (HD/C 00592) Employment records for: Scott Greschke, John Brogan, Jeffrey Crow, J. M artin, Kathy Coger, Keith M ussro, Kevin M ussro, Lisa Haney, M . Hill, Penny Allen, Paula Baker sent by email on 11/22/05

R, F H, F H, R, F R, F R, F X

203. 204. 205.

R, F, H X X

Defendant's Objections are based on the following reasons: R = Relevance; H = Hearsay; A = Authenticity; F = Foundation; BE = Best Evidence; S = Rule 408 Settlement Offer; ND = Not Disclosed

Case 1:01-cv-01690-WDM-MJW

Document 143

Filed 11/28/2005

Page 13 of 13 Page 13

Designation

Description

Of f er

Stip.

In

Out

Rul. Res.

Comment

206.

Any other employment records for the same or other employees produced by Home Depot before or at trial

X

Defendant's Objections are based on the following reasons: R = Relevance; H = Hearsay; A = Authenticity; F = Foundation; BE = Best Evidence; S = Rule 408 Settlement Offer; ND = Not Disclosed