Free Status Report - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:04-cv—01532—KAJ Document 95 Filed 01/30/2006 Page 1 of 2
222 Druxxvaiar Avmvuié, Stwrrr 900
PO. Box 25150
., ‘\"v’ll.l\llNG'l<`)lY, D1? 19899
Zw LiemrFoial>rirx1|u|=s; NH01
A T T O R N E Y S F./lEERl`Y$3S UAW l'·ll{lt’l$ W0ltLl1¥;”/l!)lE
www lw;iynr•;ll`lrm coin
502—655·5000
<_FAx) $02658-6595
Vi/l{l`l`l€.ll,S DlRE(Tli A(YtQ.ESS
302-42941227
cjohnson@bayurdlimi com
January 30, 2006
Vix Erncrnouic Fiuivc
The Honorable Kent A. Jordan
United States District Court
844 N. King Street
r Wilmington, DE l980l
Re: L0t0—Qucbec v. Gamelmzgic, Inc. and Scientqic Games
Corgvratiarzz C.A. N0. 04-1532
Dear Judge J ordan:
This letter shall serve as a Joint lnterirn Status Report due today under the
Scheduling Order entered by the Court in the above—referenced case on March 28, 2005.
Nature of the Matters in Dispute
As this Court is aware from the recent hearing on January 23, 2006, this is a
patent infringement case in which Ingenio has alleged that a GameLogic product offering
infringes one or more claims of two Ingenio patents. GanieLogic has contended that the
patents are not infringed, are invalid and are not enforceable.
Progress of Discovery to Date
To date, the parties have exchanged written discovery and documents, lngenio has
taken part of a 30(b)(6) deposition of Gamelcogic and is in the process of working with
GameLogic to reschedule the remaining witnesses for the 30(b)(6) topics. GameLogic
has noticed several third—party depositions and is working together with lngenio to find
dates to conduct those depositions that work for the parties and the third party witnesses.
Gamelsogic has also served 30(b)(6) deposition notices, for which the parties are
working together to schedule the depositions.
Each party has served its initial expert reports pursuant to the Scheduling Order
and each anticipates being able to serve rebuttal expert reports on February 14, 2006
according to the Scheduling Order as well. Both parties believe that the current March
3l, 2006 deadline for completion of discovery is reasonable and intend to conduct all of
the discovery they need by that date.
f2l5770vl

Case 1:04-cv-01532-KAJ

Document 95

Filed 01/30/2006

Page 1 of 2

Case 1:04-cv-01532-KAJ

Document 95

Filed 01/30/2006

Page 2 of 2