Free Order on Motion to Reset - District Court of Colorado - Colorado


File Size: 12.4 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Colorado
Category: District Court of Colorado
Author: unknown
Word Count: 530 Words, 3,171 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cod/26343/366.pdf

Download Order on Motion to Reset - District Court of Colorado ( 12.4 kB)


Preview Order on Motion to Reset - District Court of Colorado
Case 1:04-cv-01849-MSK-MEH

Document 366

Filed 03/29/2006

Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 04-cv-01849-MSK-MEH CAVITAT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. AETNA, INC., Defendant.

MINUTE ORDER Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on March 30, 2006. Plaintiff' Motion to Reset Settlement Conference [Filed March 24, 2006; Docket #342] is s granted. A settlement conference is hereby scheduled in this case for April 18, 2006, at 10:00 a.m. The conference will take place in Courtroom A-601 of the Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse located at 901 19th Street, Sixth Floor, Denver, Colorado. Counsel shall have parties present who shall have full authority to negotiate all terms and demands presented by the case, and full authority to enter into a settlement agreement, including an adjustor if an insurance company is involved. " authority"means that the person who attends the Full settlement conference has the complete and unfettered capacity and authority to meet or pay all terms or amounts which are demanded or sought by the other side of the case without consulting with some other person, committee or agency. If any person has limits upon the extent or amount within which he or she is authorized to settle on behalf of a party, that person does not have " authority." full No person is ever required to settle a case on any particular terms or amounts. However, if any person attends the settlement conference without full authority, and the case fails to settle, that party may be ordered to pay the attorney' fees and costs for the other side. s In order that productive settlement discussions can be held, counsel shall prepare and submit two settlement documents: one to be submitted to the other party or parties, and the other to be submitted by email only to the Magistrate Judge. The documents which are presented to opposing counsel shall contain an overview of the case from the presenter' point of view, shall summarize the s evidence which support that side' claims and shall present a demand or offer. These documents s should be intended to persuade the clients and counsel on the other side.

Case 1:04-cv-01849-MSK-MEH

Document 366

Filed 03/29/2006

Page 2 of 2

The document to be emailed to the Magistrate Judge (not submitted for filing to the court) at [email protected], in accordance with the electronic filing procedures of this court, shall contain copies of the above materials, but additionally shall contain any confidential comments which counsel wishes to make, any comments with regard to perceived weaknesses in the case and any comments which would be helpful to the magistrate in assisting the parties to negotiate a settlement. The settlement documents shall be submitted no later than five business days prior to the date of the settlement conference, and shall be submitted in a usable format (i.e., Word or WordPerfect). Please remember that anyone seeking entry into the Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse will be required to show a valid photo identification. See D.C.COLO.LCivR 83.2B.

-2-