Free Case Transferred Out to Another District - District Court of California - California


File Size: 34.3 kB
Pages: 3
Date: April 2, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 778 Words, 4,545 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/casd/266415/3-1.pdf

Download Case Transferred Out to Another District - District Court of California ( 34.3 kB)


Preview Case Transferred Out to Another District - District Court of California
Case 3:08-cv-00535-JM-RBB

Document 3

Filed 04/02/2008

Page 1 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Petitioner, a California state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for a writ of vs. A. HEDGPETH, Warden, et al., Respondents. ENRIQUE RIVERA, Petitioner, ORDER TRANSFERRING ACTION TO UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, EASTERN DIVISION Civil No. 08cv0535-JM (RBB) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

20 habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, along with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. 21 Petitioner challenges a conviction from the Riverside County Superior Court in Riverside, 22 California. In accordance with the practice of district courts in California, the Court transfers 23 the Petition to the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Eastern 24 Division. The Court does not rule on Petitioner's in forma pauperis request. 25 A petition for writ of habeas corpus may be filed in the United States District Court of

26 the judicial district in which the petitioner is presently confined or the judicial district in which 27 he was convicted and sentenced. See 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d); Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit 28 Court, 410 U.S. 484, 497 (1973). Petitioner here attacks a conviction suffered in the Riverside -108cv0535

K:\COMMON\CHMB_MIL\__SIGNED ORDERS\4 2 2008\08cv0535_Transfer_4 2 2008.wpd, 428

Case 3:08-cv-00535-JM-RBB

Document 3

Filed 04/02/2008

Page 2 of 3

1 County Superior Court in Riverside, California. (Pet. at 1.) That court is located in Riverside 2 County, which is within the jurisdictional boundaries of the United States District Court for the 3 Central District of California, Eastern Division. See 28 U.S.C. § 84(c)(1). Petitioner is presently 4 confined at Kern Valley State Prison in Delano, California. That prison is located in Kern 5 County, California, within the jurisdictional boundaries of the United States District Court for 6 the Eastern District of California. See 28 U.S.C. § 84(b). Jurisdiction over this Petition thus 7 exists in the Central District of California, Eastern Division, and in the Eastern District of 8 California. See 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d). 9 Although this Court does not have jurisdiction over the action, "[u]nder a provision of the

10 Federal Courts Improvement Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1631, if a court finds that there is a want of 11 jurisdiction the court shall transfer the action to any other such court in which the action could 12 have been brought `if it is in the interest of justice.'" Miller v. Hambrick, 905 F.2d 259, 262 (9th 13 Cir. 1990) (citing In re McCauley, 814 F.2d 1350, 1351-52 (9th Cir. 1987)). The Ninth Circuit 14 has held that transferring a habeas corpus proceeding to a district with proper jurisdiction will 15 be in the interest of justice because normally dismissal of an action that could be brought 16 elsewhere is "time-consuming and justice-defeating." Miller, 905 F.2d at 262 (quoting 17 Goldlawr, Inc. v. Heiman, 369 U.S. 463, 467 (1962). Therefore, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631, 18 this Court may transfer this proceeding to a district with proper jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 19 § 2241(d). It is generally the practice of the district courts in California to transfer habeas 20 actions challenging a state conviction to the district in which a petitioner was convicted. Any 21 and all records, witnesses and evidence necessary for the resolution of a petitioner's contentions 22 are more readily available in that district. See Braden, 410 U.S. at 497, 499 n.15; Laue v. 23 Nelson, 279 F. Supp. 265, 266 (N.D. Cal. 1968). In this case, that district is the Central District 24 of California, Eastern Division. Therefore, in the furtherance of justice, 25 IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court transfer this matter to the United States

26 District Court for the Central District of California, Eastern Division. See 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d). 27 /// 28 /// -208cv0535

K:\COMMON\CHMB_MIL\__SIGNED ORDERS\4 2 2008\08cv0535_Transfer_4 2 2008.wpd, 428

Case 3:08-cv-00535-JM-RBB

Document 3

Filed 04/02/2008

Page 3 of 3

1

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court serve a copy of this Order

2 upon Petitioner and upon the California Attorney General. 3 DATED: April 2, 2008 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -308cv0535

Hon. Jeffrey T. Miller United States District Judge

K:\COMMON\CHMB_MIL\__SIGNED ORDERS\4 2 2008\08cv0535_Transfer_4 2 2008.wpd, 428