Free Motion for Hearing - District Court of California - California

Case 3:08-cv-00519-BEN-POR
1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Document 15-2

Filed 07/10/2008

Page 1 of 2

Christopher W. Bayuk, Esq. (State Bar No. 121751) BAYUK & ASSOCIATES, INC.
401 West "A" Street, Suite 1400 San Diego, CA, 92101 Telephone: (619) 232-7945 Facsimile: (619) 232-7953

Attorneys for PLAINTIFF: KAYlACASHMAN, BY AND THROUGH
HER GUARDIAN AD LITEM BERNADETTE HilGEMAN: AND STEPHAN CASHMAN, AN INDIVIDUAL

8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
VS.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KAYlA CASHMAN BY AND THROUGH HER GUARDIAN AD LITEM, BERNADETTE HilGEMAN: AND STEPHAN CASHMAN, AN INDIVIDUAL PLAI NTI FF
J

Case Number:

08 CV 0519-BEN (POR)

Proof of Service
TIME:

18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 I, Catie Linfesty J declare:
MIKE McDERMOTT PLUMBING., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION; MALIBU RIVIERA II LL, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION; AND DOES I THROUGH XX INCLUSIVE, DEFENDANTS.

August 4, 2008 10:30 am 3 Roger T. Benitez

I am a resident of the State of California and over the age of eighteen years, and not a partyto the within-entitled action; my business address is 401 West "A" Street, Suite 1400, San Diego,

26 27 28 CA,92019. On July 10, 2008, I served the within documents. STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE and UNSIGNED ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF HEARING DATE

Proof

of Seroice

Case 3:08-cv-00519-BEN-POR 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12
u !:
E-

Document 15-2

Filed 07/10/2008

Page 2 of 2

_x By Electronic Service: I am familiar with the United States District Court, Southern District of California's practice for collecting and processing electronic filing. Under that practice, documents are electronically filed with the Court. The Court's CM/ECF system will generate a Notice of Electronic filing{NEF) to the filing party, the assigned judge, and any registered users in the case. The NEF will constitute service of the document. Registration as a CM/EMF user constitutes consent or electronic service through the Court's transmission facilities. Under said practice, the following CM/ECF users were served:

.

0 0 ~
.. :I -

en iJ.~~- 0 ~ <..J"':;:

13

u<
",
'" <'" ...

Ow~U.
u '" 0 ..

z< 14
15 16 17 18 19 20
Q

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above is true and correct. Executed on Wednesday, July 10, 2008 at San Diego, California.

-'

:;

<.~

~<:;:.. ::J U" >~'"
< a:i 0

...

"

L;atle

21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Cashman V SDUSD

Proofof Service 2