Case 3:08-cv-00447-WQH-LSP
Document 19
Filed 05/15/2008
Page 1 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Callie A. Bjurstrom, State Bar No. 137816 Michelle A. Herrera, State Bar. No. 209842 LUCE, FORWARD, HAMILTON & SCRIPPS LLP 600 West Broadway, Suite 2600 San Diego, California 92101-3372 Telephone No.: 619.236.1414 Fax No.: 619.232.8311 [email protected] [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiff INSWEB CORPORATION John Christopher Jaczko, State Bar No. 149317 Allison H. Goddard, State Bar No. 211098 Jaczko Goddard LLP 4401 Eastgate Mall San Diego, California 92121 Telephone No.: 858.550.6150 Fax No.: 858.225.3500 [email protected] [email protected]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
INSWEB CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. AUTOBYTEL, INC., AUTOBYTEL I CORP., f/k/a AVV, INC., and DOMINION ENTERPRISES, Defendants.
Case No. 08-CV-0447 WQH (LSP) JOINT MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
Plaintiff INSWEB CORPORATION and Defendants AUTOBYTEL, INC., AUTOBYTEL I CORP., f/k/a AVV, INC. and DOMINION ENTERPRISES, by and through their respective counsel hereby jointly move, pursuant to Local Rule 12.1, that Defendants' time to file any and all pleadings responsive to the First Amended Complaint in the above-captioned matter shall be enlarged to June 2, 2008. This Joint Motion is based on the following facts: Plaintiff filed its Complaint in this action on March 11, 2008. 1
Case No. 08-CV-0447 WQH (LSP)
Case 3:08-cv-00447-WQH-LSP
Document 19
Filed 05/15/2008
Page 2 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Plaintiff filed its First Amended Complaint was on April 17, 2008. Plaintiff and Defendants moved jointly on April 21, 2008 to allow Defendants up to and including May 16, 2008 to respond to the First Amended Complaint. (Doc. # 13.) The Court granted this Joint Motion on April 23, 2008. (Doc. # 17.) Plaintiff and Defendants have agreed to enlarge Defendants' time to respond to the First Amended Complaint by approximately 15 days to June 2, 2008. Good cause exists to enlarge Defendants' time to respond, because it will allow Defendants to complete their initial review and analysis and adequately respond to Plaintiff's claims. No party would be prejudiced by this brief delay. Plaintiff and Defendants therefore respectfully request that the Court grant this Joint Motion.
DATED: May 15, 2008
LUCE, FORWARD, HAMILTON & SCRIPPS LLP
By: s/Michelle A. Herrera Michelle A. Herrera Attorneys for Plaintiff INSWEB CORPORATION DATED: May 15, 2008 JACZKO GODDARD LLP
16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
Case No. 08-CV-0447 WQH (LSP)
By: s/Allison H. Goddard Allison H. Goddard Attorneys for Defendants AUTOBYTEL, INC., AUTOBYTEL I CORP., f/k/a AVV, INC. and DOMINION ENTERPRISES