Free Notice of Document Discrepancy and Order Thereon - District Court of California - California


File Size: 16.8 kB
Pages: 1
Date: July 24, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 325 Words, 1,997 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/casd/261090/24.pdf

Download Notice of Document Discrepancy and Order Thereon - District Court of California ( 16.8 kB)


Preview Notice of Document Discrepancy and Order Thereon - District Court of California
Case 3:08-cv-00051-L-CAB

Document 24

Filed 07/24/2008

Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NOTICE OF DOCUMENT DISCREPANCIES AND ORDER THEREON CASE NO.: 08cv51-L(CAB) CASE TITLE: Collins et al. v. Winex Investments, LLC et al. E-FILED DATE: 7/21/08 DOCKET NO.: 22 DOCUMENT TITLE: Opposition to Motion to Dismiss DOCUMENT FILED BY: Plaintiffs Upon the electronic filing of the above referenced document(s), the following discrepancies are noted: x
Civil Local Rule or Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual provision ("ECF")

Discrepancy

ECF § 2(h) ECF § 2(a), (g) ECF § 2(g) ECF § 2(f) Civ. L. Rule 5.1 Civ. L. Rule 7.1 or 47.1 Civ. L. Rule 7.1 or 47.1 Civ. L. Rule 7.1 or 47.1 Civ. L. Rule 7.1 Civ. L. Rule 15.1 x ECF § 2(e) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: x

Includes a proposed order or requires judge's signature Docket entry does not accurately reflect the document(s) filed Multiple pleadings in one docket entry not separated out as attachments Lacking proper signature Missing time and date on motion and/or supporting documentation Date noticed for hearing not in compliance with rules/Document(s) are not timely Lacking memorandum of points and authorities in support as a separate document Briefs or memoranda exceed length restrictions Missing table of contents and table of authorities Amended pleading not complete in itself OTHER: No courtesy copy provided

If a courtesy copy is not delivered to chambers before close of business on July 28, 2008, the documents will be stricken from the record.

The document is rejected. It is ordered that the Clerk STRIKE the document from the record, and serve a copy of this order on all parties. Counsel is advised that any further failure to comply with the Local Rules or Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual may lead to penalties pursuant to Civil Local Rule 83.1. DATED: July 24, 2008

M. James Lorenz United States District Court Judge