Free Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer - District Court of California - California


File Size: 21.9 kB
Pages: 3
Date: November 9, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 525 Words, 3,242 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/casd/257166/10.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer - District Court of California ( 21.9 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer - District Court of California
Case 3:07-cv-02038-WQH-RBB 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Plaintiff, 15 16 17 18 19 Defendants. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v.

Document 10

Filed 11/09/2007

Page 1 of 3

Manuel de la Cerra (SBN 189313) John L. Roberts (SBN 208927) THE LAW OFFICE OF MANUEL DE LA CERRA 6885 Catamaran Drive Carlsbad, CA 92011 Telephone: 760-809-5520 Facsimile: 760-269-3542 E-mail: [email protected] Attorneys for Defendants, HERITAGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., CARL THOMPSON and CHARLES WISSMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO DIVISION GREENLEE TEXTRON INC., a Delaware corporation, Case No.: 07 CV 2038 WQH (RBB) JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

HERITAGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a California Corporation; CARL THOMPSON, an individual; CHARLES WISSMAN, an individual; and DOES 110,

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to the above-entitled action, through their respective counsel, subject to the approval of this Honorable Court, that Defendants' time to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint be extended up to and including December 19, 2007. This stipulation is made pursuant to CivLR 7.2 and 12.1 and is not entered into for the purposes of inconvenience or delay. Defendant HERITAGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. has agreed to provide to Plaintiff an exemplar of the accused device and schematic drawings

Case 3:07-cv-02038-WQH-RBB 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATED: _November 9, 2007 DATED: _November 9, 2007

Document 10

Filed 11/09/2007

Page 2 of 3

subject to a confidentiality agreement, and Plaintiff will conduct testing on the device to further investigate facts related to the pending patent infringement action. There have been no previous requests to continue the Defendants' time to respond to the Complaint.
Respectfully submitted, THE LAW OFFICE OF MANUEL DE LA CERRA

By: s/Manuel de la Cerra Manuel de la Cerra John L. Roberts Attorneys for Defendants HERITAGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., CARL THOMPSON and CHARLES WISSMAN

Respectfully submitted, ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP

By: s/Kent B. Goss Kent B. Goss Attorneys for Plaintiff GREENLEE TEXTRON INC.

2

Case 3:07-cv-02038-WQH-RBB 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Document 10

Filed 11/09/2007

Page 3 of 3

PROOF OF SERVICE I am employed in San Diego County, State of California. I am over the age of 18 and not a party to the within action. My business address is 6885 Catamaran Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92011. On November 9, 2007, I served on the interested parties in said action the following: · JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT · [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT by placing a true copy thereof in a sealed envelope addressed as follows and deposited it in the U.S. Mail at Carlsbad, California: Kent B. Goss Orrick Herrinton & Sutcliffe LLP 777 South Figueroa St, Suit 3200 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Attorney for Greenlee Textron, Inc

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on November 9, 2007 at Carlsbad, California.

___s/Manuel F. de la Cerra_______ Manuel F. de la Cerra

3