Free Stipulation - District Court of California - California

Case 3:08-cr-00566-PJH

Document 5

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO (CABN 44332) United States Attorney BRIAN J. STRETCH (CABN 163973) Chief, Criminal Division KATHERINE B. DOWLING (CABN 220767) Assistant United States Attorney 450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055 San Francisco, California 94102 Telephone: (415) 436-6833 Facsimile: (415) 436-7234 [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JUAN CARLOS VERDUSCO-MACIAS, Defendant.

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

CR No. 08-0566 PJH STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXCLUDING TIME UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 3161

On August 22, 2008, the parties appeared before the Court for arraignment on the indictment. The Court set September 10, 2008 for trial setting. The Court agreed to exclude all time under the Speedy Trial Act between August 22, 2008 and September 10, 2008 for effective preparation of counsel. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv). The parties and the Court agreed that the ends of justice served by granting such a continuance for effective preparation of counsel outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A).

STIP. & [PROPOSED] ORDER EXCL. TIM E CR 08-0566 PJH

1

Case 3:08-cr-00566-PJH

Document 5

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

SO STIPULATED: JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO United States Attorney

DATED: August 22, 2008

/s/ KATHERINE B. DOWLING Assistant United States Attorney

DATED: August 22, 2008

/s/ JODI LINKER Attorney for Defendant

Failure to grant an exclusion of time for the requested continuance would deny counsel for defendant reasonable time necessary for effective preparation. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv). Therefore, the Court finds that exclusion of time from August 22, 2008 through September 10, 2008, is warranted because the ends of justice served by the exclusion of time outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A).

SO ORDERED.

DATED:______________

_____________________________________ MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOSEPH C. SPERO United States District Judge

STIP. & [PROPOSED] ORDER EXCL. TIM E CR 08-0566 PJH

2