Free Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - District Court of California - California

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 1 of 55

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 2 of 55

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 3 of 55

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 4 of 55

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 5 of 55

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 6 of 55

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 7 of 55

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 8 of 55

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 9 of 55

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 10 of 55

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 11 of 55

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 12 of 55

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 13 of 55

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 14 of 55

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 15 of 55

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 16 of 55

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 17 of 55

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 18 of 55

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 19 of 55

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 20 of 55

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 21 of 55

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 22 of 55

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 23 of 55

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 24 of 55

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 25 of 55

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 26 of 55

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 27 of 55

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 28 of 55

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 29 of 55

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 30 of 55

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 31 of 55

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 32 of 55

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 33 of 55

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 34 of 55

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 35 of 55

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 36 of 55

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 37 of 55

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 38 of 55

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 39 of 55

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 40 of 55

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 41 of 55

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 42 of 55

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 43 of 55

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 44 of 55

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 45 of 55

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 46 of 55

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 47 of 55

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 48 of 55

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 49 of 55

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 50 of 55

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 51 of 55

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 52 of 55

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 53 of 55

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 54 of 55

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 55 of 55

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-2

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 1 of 39

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-2

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 2 of 39

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-2

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 3 of 39

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-2

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 4 of 39

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-2

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 5 of 39

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-2

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 6 of 39

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-2

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 7 of 39

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-2

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 8 of 39

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-2

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 9 of 39

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-2

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 10 of 39

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-2

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 11 of 39

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-2

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 12 of 39

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-2

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 13 of 39

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-2

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 14 of 39

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-2

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 15 of 39

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-2

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 16 of 39

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-2

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 17 of 39

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-2

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 18 of 39

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-2

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 19 of 39

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-2

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 20 of 39

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-2

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 21 of 39

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-2

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 22 of 39

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-2

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 23 of 39

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-2

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 24 of 39

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-2

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 25 of 39

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-2

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 26 of 39

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-2

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 27 of 39

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-2

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 28 of 39

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-2

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 29 of 39

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-2

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 30 of 39

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-2

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 31 of 39

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-2

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 32 of 39

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-2

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 33 of 39

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-2

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 34 of 39

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-2

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 35 of 39

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-2

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 36 of 39

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-2

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 37 of 39

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-2

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 38 of 39

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-2

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 39 of 39

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-3

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 1 of 34

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-3

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 2 of 34

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-3

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 3 of 34

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-3

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 4 of 34

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-3

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 5 of 34

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-3

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 6 of 34

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-3

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 7 of 34

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-3

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 8 of 34

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-3

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 9 of 34

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-3

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 10 of 34

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-3

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 11 of 34

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-3

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 12 of 34

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-3

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 13 of 34

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-3

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 14 of 34

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-3

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 15 of 34

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-3

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 16 of 34

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-3

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 17 of 34

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-3

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 18 of 34

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-3

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 19 of 34

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-3

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 20 of 34

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-3

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 21 of 34

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-3

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 22 of 34

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-3

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 23 of 34

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-3

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 24 of 34

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-3

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 25 of 34

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-3

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 26 of 34

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-3

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 27 of 34

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-3

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 28 of 34

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-3

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 29 of 34

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-3

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 30 of 34

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-3

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 31 of 34

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-3

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 32 of 34

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-3

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 33 of 34

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-3

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 34 of 34

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 1 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 2 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 3 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 4 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 5 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 6 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 7 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 8 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 9 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 10 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 11 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 12 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 13 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 14 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 15 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 16 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 17 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 18 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 19 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 20 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 21 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 22 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 23 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 24 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 25 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 26 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 27 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 28 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 29 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 30 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 31 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 32 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 33 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 34 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 35 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 36 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 37 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 38 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 39 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 40 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 41 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 42 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 43 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 44 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 45 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 46 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 47 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 48 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 49 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 50 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 51 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 52 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 53 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 54 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 55 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 56 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 57 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 58 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 59 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 60 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 61 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 62 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 63 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 64 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 65 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 66 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 67 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 68 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 69 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 70 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 71 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 72 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 73 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 74 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 75 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 76 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 77 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 78 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 79 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 80 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 81 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 82 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 83 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 84 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 85 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 86 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 87 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 88 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 89 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 90 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 91 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 92 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 93 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 94 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 95 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 96 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 97 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 98 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 99 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 100 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 101 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 102 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 103 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 104 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 105 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 106 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 107 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 108 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 109 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 110 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 111 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 112 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 113 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-4

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 114 of 114

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-5

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 1 of 1

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-6

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 1 of 3

Victoria C. Minor Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Office of the Clerk 501 "I" Street Sacramento, CA 95814 July 23, 2008

Divisional Office 2500 Tulare Street Fresno, CA 93721

Case Number:

2:08-CV-01659-GGH

Case Title:

LIONEL NAVARRO,

vs. ROBERT AYERS JR.,

Dear Litigant, You are hereby notified that the above case number has been assigned to your action. You are to include the complete case number on all documents sent to the court for filing in this case. Failure to do so results in delayed processing of your documents. All matters in this action shall be sent to the following address until further notice: Office of the Clerk United States District Court Eastern District of California 501 "I" Street , Suite 4-200 Sacramento, CA 95814 For timely processing of your pleadings or correspondence, please comply with our Local Rules of Court, in particular: Local Rule 5-133 The court requires an original plus one copy of each document sent for filing. If you desire to receive a conformed copy for your records, you must send an original and two copies of your document and a pre-addressed postage-paid envelope for us to return your copy to you. Local Rule 5-135 Once the defendant(s) have served a responsive pleading, you are under an ongoing duty to serve them with copies of all documents you submit to the court. A proof of service shall be attached to the original of any document lodged or filed with the court, showing the date, manner and place of service. A sample proof of service is attached. Local Rule 7-130 Documents submitted to the court must be legible, on 8-½ " x 11" paper, with writing on one (1) side of the page only. Each separate document must be stapled at the top left corner and pre-punched with two (2) holes centered 2-¾" apart, ½" from the top edge of the page. Each page should be numbered consecutively at the bottom. Local Rule 7-132 Every document submitted to the court must include your name, address and prisoner identification number in the upper left hand corner of the first page. The caption on the first page must include the title of this court, the title of the action, the case number assigned to this action (including all initials and letters that follow the number), and the title of your document. If you are pursuing more than one action in this court, you must submit a separate original document and the appropriate number of copies for each action in which you want the document filed.

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC
time should be filed before the deadline in question.

Document 1-6

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 2 of 3

Local Rule 6-142 A request for extension of time must state the reason an extension is needed. A request for extension of

Local Rules 30-250, 33-250, 34-250 and 36-250 Discovery requests or responses should not be submitted to the court unless they are relevant and necessary to support or oppose a motion at issue before the court. Local Rule 83-182 Each party appearing in propria persona is under a continuing duty to notify the Clerk and all other parties of any change of address. Other Provisions: Request for Case Status The court will notify you as soon as any action is taken in your case. Due to the large number of civil actions pending before the court, THE CLERK IS UNABLE TO RESPOND IN WRITING TO INDIVIDUAL INQUIRES REGARDING THE STATUS OF YOUR CASE. As long as you keep the court apprised of your current address, you will receive all court decisions which might affect the status of your case. Copy Work The Clerk's Office does not provide copies of documents to parties. Copies of documents may be obtained from Attorney's Diversified Service (ADS) by writing to them at: 1424 21st Street, Sacramento, CA 95814, or by phoning 916-441-4396 or 916-441-4466. The court will provide copies of docket sheets at $0.50 per page. Note: In Forma Pauperis status does not include the cost of copies.

Victoria C. Minor Clerk of Court United States District Court by: /s/ K. Carlos Deputy Clerk

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-6

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 3 of 3

The following is a sample Proof of Service. Pursuant to Rule 5 of the F.R.Cv.P. and Local Rule 5-135, each document filed after the court orders service in your case shall be served on opposing counsel and a proof of service attached to your document filed with the court.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

(Case Title) Plaintiff or Petitioner V. Case Number: 2:99-CV-99999 ABC DFG (example case no.)

Defendant or Respondent SAMPLE PROOF OF SERVICE /

I hereby certify that on of the attached

(Date)

, I served a copy ,

(Title of Document Served and Filed)

by placing a copy in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said enevelope in the United States Mail at (Location of Mailing) :

(List Name and Address of Each Defendant or Attorney Served)

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

(Name of Person Completing Service)

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-7

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LIONEL NAVARRO,
Plaintiff(s)/Petitioner(s),

Case No. 2:08-CV-01659-GGH ORDER RE CONSENT

vs. ROBERT AYERS JR.,
Defendant(s)/Respondents(s).

OR REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT

This case was randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows. Without the written consent of the parties presently appearing pursuant to 28 U.S.C Sec. 636(c), a magistrate judge cannot conduct all proceedings and enter judgment in this case with direct review by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, in the event an appeal is filed. If a party declines to consent and the case is assigned to a district judge, the assigned magistrate judge shall continue to perform all duties as required by Eastern District Local Rule 72-302. Accordingly, within 30 days, the parties shall complete and return this form to the court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 7/23/08 /s/ - Gregory G. Hollows United States Magistrate Judge

IMPORTANT: You must check and sign only one section of this form and return it to the Clerk's Office within 30 days. The complaint/petition will not be reviewed by the court until plaintiff/petitioner has signed and returned this form. Note: This form must be completed and returned regardless of the choice exercised by any other party.

CONSENT TO JURISDICTION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The undersigned hereby voluntarily consents to have a United States Magistrate Judge conduct all further proceedings in this case.

Date: ___________________

Signature: _______________________________ Print Name: ______________________________ ( ) Plaintiff/Petitioner ( ) Defendant/Respondent ( ) Counsel for *

DECLINE OF JURISDICTION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT TO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The undersigned declines to consent to the United States Magistrate Judge assigned to this case and requests random assignment to a United States District Judge. Date: ___________________ Signature: _______________________________ Print Name: ______________________________ ( ) Plaintiff/Petitioner ( ) Defendant/Respondent ( ) Counsel for *

*If counsel of record, list name of each party responding: _______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-8

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 1 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. ROBERT AYERS, et al., Respondents. / Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner is presently incarcerated at San Quentin State Prison. Petitioner challenges the 2007 decision by the Board of Parole Hearings (BPH) finding him unsuitable for parole. It is established that a petitioner for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 must name "the state officer having custody of him or her as the respondent to the petition." Stanley v. Cal. Supreme Court, 21 F.3d 359, 360 (9th Cir.1994). The U.S.Supreme Court recently reiterated that with certain infrequent exceptions not applicable here: The federal habeas statute straightforwardly provides that the proper respondent to a habeas petition is "the person who has custody over [the petitioner]." 28 U.S.C. § 2242; see also § 2243 1 ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA LIONEL NAVARRO, Petitioner, No. CIV S-08-1659 GGH P

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-8

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 2 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

("The writ, or order to show cause shall be directed to the person having custody of the person detained"). The consistent use of the definite article in reference to the custodian indicates that there is generally only one proper respondent to a given prisoner's habeas petition. This custodian, moreover, is "the person" with the ability to produce the prisoner's body before the habeas court. Ibid. We summed up the plain language of the habeas statute over 100 years ago in this way: "[T]hese provisions contemplate a proceeding against some person who has the immediate custody of the party detained, with the power to produce the body of such party before the court or judge, that he may be liberated if no sufficient reason is shown to the contrary." Wales v. Whitney, 114 U.S. 564, 574, 5 S.Ct. 1050, 29 L.Ed. 277 (1885) (emphasis added); see also Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of Ky., 410 U.S. 484, 494-495, 93 S.Ct. 1123, 35 L.Ed.2d 443 (1973) ("The writ of habeas corpus" acts upon "the person who holds [the detainee] in what is alleged to be unlawful custody," citing Wales, supra, at 574, 5 S.Ct. 1050); Braden, supra, at 495, 93 S.Ct. 1123 ("`[T]his writ ... is directed to ... [the] jailer,'" quoting In the Matter of Jackson, 15 Mich. 417, 439- 440 (1867)). In accord with the statutory language and Wales' immediate custodian rule, longstanding practice confirms that in habeas challenges to present physical confinement­"core challenges"--the default rule is that the proper respondent is the warden of the facility where the prisoner is being held, not the Attorney General or some other remote supervisory official. Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 426, 434-435, 124 S.Ct. 2711, 2717-2718 (2004) (emphasis added) (refusing to recognize the Secretary of Defense as the custodian of military detainees, and finding that the commander of the brig where Padilla was being held is the proper custodian). See also Brittingham v. United States, 982 F.2d 378, 379 (9th Cir. 1992) ("A custodian `is the person having a day-to-day control over the prisoner. That person is the only one who can produce `the body' of the petitioner." Guerra v. Meese, 786 F.2d 414, 416 (D.C.Cir.1986) (Parole Commission is not custodian despite its power to release petitioner). But see Ortiz-Zandoval v. Gomez, 81 F.3d 891 (9th Cir. 1996) permitting the head of California Corrections to be the proper custodian, but this case is in doubt after Padilla which held that a remote supervisory official was not to be the custodian). Thus, the proper custodian is the warden or sheriff in charge of the facility where the prisoner is confined. ///// 2

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-8

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 3 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ///// ///// ///// ///// /////

Any warden or sheriff in California is amenable to personal jurisdiction in the Eastern District in cases alleging that the BPH improperly found a prisoner unsuitable for parole because personal jurisdiction is a state-wide, not individual district, concept. However, venue concepts are oriented to individual districts. In habeas corpus cases, venue is proper: (1) in the district of confinement, or (2) in the district of "conviction and sentencing." 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d). Because it is difficult to stretch "conviction and sentencing" into a decision revoking parole, only the first venue option is appropriate. Moreover, since prisoners are not normally transferred about for parole eligibility or revocation hearings, the district of confinement would normally be the district of "conviction and sentencing" anyway even if that rubric were utilized in the parole eligibility setting.1 Thus, the court should not maintain this case in this district. 2

If the literal interpretation of "conviction and sentencing" were to be employed, i.e., the district where petitioner suffered his underlying conviction, maintaining the action in that place in parole suitability situations would not be as appropriate as having it in the place of confinement. First, in the logistical sense, the issue of parole suitability has little to do with the place of conviction ­ the court will not be concerned with the ease of mustering witnesses and evidence. Secondly, even though the local government officials at the place of conviction may retain an interest in having parole denied, habeas cases are handled by the state Attorney General's Office, and local officials are not involved in the federal court litigation regarding review of the parole eligibility decision. The issues involved in the federal court review will not center about the opinions of local officials, and even if it did, those opinions will be of record already. The opposite policy is in effect for the "usual" habeas cases involving attack upon a conviction or sentence. In those cases there is an advantage to transferring to the district of conviction because evidence and witnesses for any evidentiary hearing are more likely to be located there. The California federal district courts have long employed a blanket transfer policy to the district of conviction for "conviction" habeas cases. 3
2

1

Case 3:08-cv-03928-MMC

Document 1-8

Filed 08/18/2008

Page 4 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
nav1659.tra

Accordingly, in the furtherance of justice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d). DATED: 08/08/08 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows GREGORY G. HOLLOWS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

4