Free Stipulation - District Court of California - California


File Size: 36.5 kB
Pages: 3
Date: September 4, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 443 Words, 2,880 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/204975/9.pdf

Download Stipulation - District Court of California ( 36.5 kB)


Preview Stipulation - District Court of California
Case 5:08-cr-00452-RMW

Document 9

Filed 09/04/2008

Page 1 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO (CASBN 44332) United States Attorney BRIAN J. STRETCH (CASBN 163973) Chief, Criminal Division CHAD M. MANDELL (ILBN 6286783) Special Assistant United States Attorney 150 Almaden Boulevard San Jose, California 95113 Telephone: (408) 535-5059 Facsimile: (408) 535-5066 Email: [email protected] Attorneys for the United States of America

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The parties stipulate that the time between August 11, 2008 to September 8, 2008 is excluded under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. §3161, and agree that the failure to grant the requested continuance would unreasonably deny defense counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. Finally, the parties agree that the ends of justice served by granting the requested continuance outweigh the best interest of the public, and the defendant in a speedy trial and in the prompt disposition of // // v. WENCESLADO VALENCIA-LOPEZ Defendant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CR 08-00452 RMW UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXCLUDING TIME FROM AUGUST 11, 2008 TO SEPTEMBER 8, 2008 FROM THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT CALCULATION (18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A))

1

Case 5:08-cr-00452-RMW

Document 9

Filed 09/04/2008

Page 2 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

criminal cases. 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(8)(A).

DATED: August 11, 2008

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO United States Attorney __/s/___________________________________ CHAD M. MANDELL Special Assistant United States Attorney

___/s/__________________________________ LARA VINNARD Attorney for Defendant

2

Case 5:08-cr-00452-RMW

Document 9

Filed 09/04/2008

Page 3 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED:

ORDER Based upon the stipulation of the parties, and for good cause shown, the Court HEREBY ORDERS that the time between August 11, 2008 to September 8, 2008 is excluded under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. §3161. The court finds that the failure to grant the requested continuance would unreasonably deny defense counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. Furthermore, the Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting the requested continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial and in the prompt disposition of criminal cases. The court therefore concludes that this exclusion of time should be made under 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(8)(A).

_______________________________________ RONALD M. WHYTE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

3