Free ADR Clerks Notice - District Court of California - California

Case 3:08-cv-02930-MEJ

Document 5

Filed 09/04/2008

Page 1 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Northern District of California Beck, Plaintiff(s), v. Starbucks Corporation, Defendant(s). 08-02930 MEJ NOTICE RE: NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT ORDER

United States District Court

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

The parties have failed to file an ADR Certification and either a Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Selecting an ADR Process or a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference as required by the Initial Case Management Scheduling Order. Counsel shall Meet and Confer forthwith in an attempt to agree on an ADR process for this matter. Thereafter, counsel, on behalf of themselves and each party, promptly shall file an ADR Certification and either 1) a Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Selecting ADR Process, or 2) a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference (Civil L.R. 16-8(b), ADR L. R. 3-5(b) Civil L.R. 16-8(c), ADR L. R. 3-5(c), (d)). (These forms are available at www.adr.cand.uscourts.gov.)

Further, in accordance with ADR L.R. 3-5(e) counsel shall concurrently provide a copy of all documents filed pursuant to this notice directly to the ADR Unit either by fax (415-522-4112), hand delivery (ADR Program, USDC, Northern District of California, Notice Re: Noncompliance With Court Order 08-02930 MEJ -1-

Case 3:08-cv-02930-MEJ

Document 5

Filed 09/04/2008

Page 2 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Northern District of California

450 Golden Gate Avenue, 16th Floor, San Francisco, California), or by PDF attachment to an e-mail directed to [email protected].

It is the responsibility of counsel to schedule an ADR Phone Conference, if required, to occur before the Case Management Conference.

Dated: September 4, 2008 RICHARD W. WIEKING Clerk by: Lisa M. Salvetti

United States District Court

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Notice Re: Noncompliance With Court Order 08-02930 MEJ -2ADR Administrative Assistant 415-522-2032 [email protected]

Case 3:08-cv-02930-MEJ

Document 5

Filed 09/04/2008

Page 3 of 4

PROOF OF SERVICE Case Name: Case Number: Beck v. Starbucks Corporation 08-02930 MEJ

I declare that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. I am over the age of eighteen (18) years and not a party to the action. My business address is: ADR Program United States District Court Norther District of California 450 Golden Gate Avenue Floor 16 San Francisco, CA 94102 On September 4, 2008, I served a true and correct copy of: Notice Re: Noncompliance With Court Order [X] electronically, I caused said documents to be transmitted using ECF as specified by General Order No. 45 to the following parties: Robert Charles Hubbs Kneisler, Schondel & Hubbs P.O. Box 5767 538 Mendocino Ave. Santa Rosa, CA 95401 [email protected] E. Denise Schissler Kneisler, Schondel & Hubbs 538 Mendocino Avenue P.O. Box 5767 Santa Rosa, CA 95402-5767 Jonmi Nai On Koo Perkins Coie 4 Embarcadero, Suite 2400 San Francisco San Francisco, CA 94107 [email protected] David Raymond Ongaro

Case 3:08-cv-02930-MEJ

Document 5

Filed 09/04/2008

Page 4 of 4

Rao Ongaro Burtt & Tiliakos LLP 22 Battery Street 10th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 [email protected]

[ ] by Facsimile, I caused said documents to be transmitted to the following parties by fax machine: [ ] by U. S. Mail, I placed a true copy in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid in the United States Post Office Mail Box in San Francisco, California, addressed as follows:

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on September 4, 2008 in San Francisco, California. RICHARD W. WIEKING Clerk by: Lisa M. Salvetti

ADR Administrative Assistant 415-522-2032 [email protected]