Free Proposed Order - District Court of California - California


File Size: 14.5 kB
Pages: 2
Date: June 4, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 351 Words, 2,339 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/204121/6.pdf

Download Proposed Order - District Court of California ( 14.5 kB)


Preview Proposed Order - District Court of California
Case 3:08-cv-02763-MHP

Document 6

Filed 06/10/2008

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

GILL SPERLEIN (172887) THE LAW FIRM OF GILL SPERLEIN 584 Castro Street, Suite 849 San Francisco, California 94114 Telephone: (415) 378-2625 Facsimile: (415) 252-7747 [email protected] Attorney for Plaintiff IO GROUP, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) CASE NO.: 08-2763 (MHP) ) ) ) [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR LEAVE TO ) TAKE EARLY DISCOVERY ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IO GROUP, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff, vs. JOHN DOES 1 and 2, individuals, Defendants.

[PROPOSED] ORDER Having considered Plaintiff's Miscellaneous Administrative Request Pursuant to Local Rule 7-11 for Leave to Take Discovery Prior to Rule 26 Conference and finding good cause therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that plaintiff is granted leave to take early discovery. Plaintiff may immediately serve on Internet access providers subpoenas to obtain subscriber information for subscribers assigned ip addresses previously provided by Ning, Inc. Such

27 28

subpoenas should be substantially in the same form as the example attached to plaintiff's

-1[PROPOSED] ORDER FOR LEAVE TO TAKE EARLY DISCOVERY C-08-2763 (MHP)

Case 3:08-cv-02763-MHP

Document 6

Filed 06/10/2008

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3

Miscellaneous Administrative Request for Leave to Take Discovery Prior to Rule 26 Conference as Exhibit A; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that subpoenas authorized by this order and issued

4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

pursuant thereto shall be deemed appropriate court orders under 47 U.S.C. ยง551; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that Internet access providers shall have fourteen (14) days from the date they are served a copy of this order to respond to the subpoena in order that such provider shall have sufficient time to provide notice to the subscriber whose subscriber information plaintiff seeks to obtain thereby; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that good faith attempts by Internet service providers to notify the subscribers shall constitute compliance with this order.

Dated:___________________________

_____________________________ THE HONORABLE MARILYN HALL PATEL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

-2[PROPOSED] ORDER FOR LEAVE TO TAKE EARLY DISCOVERY C-08-2763 (MHP)