Free Notice of need of ADR Phone Conference (ADR L.R. 3-5 d) - District Court of California - California


File Size: 88.1 kB
Pages: 2
Date: August 27, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 473 Words, 2,820 Characters
Page Size: 618 x 784 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/201723/31.pdf

Download Notice of need of ADR Phone Conference (ADR L.R. 3-5 d) - District Court of California ( 88.1 kB)


Preview Notice of need of ADR Phone Conference (ADR L.R. 3-5 d) - District Court of California
Case 4:08-cv-01066-SBA

Document 31

Filed 08/27/2008

Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JANE R. EVANS, Plaintiff,
v.

Case No. CV-08-1066 SB A NOTICE OF NEED FOR ADR PHONE CONFERENCE

SANDPLAY THERAPISTS OF AMERICA, Defendant.
/

Defense counsel reports that efforts to meet and confer with In Pro Per Plaintiff, Jane Evans, regarding ADR have been unsuccessful. Plaintiff has not responded to Defense counsel's email. Thus, counsel: Have not yet reached an agreement to an ADR process Defense Counsel requests an Early Settlement Conference with a Magistrate Judge after the Case Management Conference and the Hearing on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and/or Motion for Summary Judgment scheduled for September 9, 2008. Date of Case Management Conference: September 9, 2008. The following counsel will participate in the ADR phone conference: Name Party Representing Defendant Sandplav Phone No. 408-795-3414 E-Mail Address [email protected]

Brian T. McMillan

Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR Local Rule 3-5 require that lead trial counsel participate in a telephone conference with a member of the ADR Legal Staff before the Case Management Conference. The ADR Unit ([email protected]') will notify you of the date and time of your phone conference. Dated: Dated: August27,.2008 , 2008 Attorney for Plaintiff f^*^fa*J><£/fctiJj!fb Attorney for Defendant

Firmwide:86355860.1 060273.1001

Case 4:08-cv-01066-SBA

Document 31

Filed 08/27/2008

Page 2 of 2

1

PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL I am employed in Santa Clara County, California. I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the within-entitled action. My business address is 50 West San Fernando Street, 15th Floor, San Jose, California 95113.2303. I am readily familiar with this firm's practice for collection and processing of correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal Service. On August 27, 2008, I placed with this firm at the above address for deposit with the United States Postal Service a true and correct copy of the within document(s):

2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
LITTLER MENDELSON

NOTICE OF NEED FOR ADR PHONE CONFERENCE
in a sealed envelope, postage fully paid, addressed as follows: Jane Rocio Evans, MFT P.O. Box 424886 San Francisco, CA 94142 Following ordinary business practices, the envelope was sealed and placed for collection and mailing on this date, and would, in the ordinary course of business, be deposited with the United States Postal Service on this date. I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this court at whose direction the service was made. Executed on August 27, 2008, at San Jose, California.

Kathleen M. Dolce

(Case No. CV-08-01066 SBA )
Firmwide:86431789.1 060273.1001