Free Order - District Court of California - California


File Size: 111.5 kB
Pages: 3
Date: July 1, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 648 Words, 3,979 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/201622/26.pdf

Download Order - District Court of California ( 111.5 kB)


Preview Order - District Court of California
Case 3:08-cv-01519-BZ

Document 26

Filed 07/01/2008

Page 1 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Following the Case Management Conference, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Case Management Statement is adopted, except as expressly modified by this Order. that: 1. DATES It is further ORDERED MARION TAYLOR, individually ) and on behalf of all other ) similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiff(s), ) ) v. ) ) PANERA BREAD CO., et al., ) ) ) Defendant(s). ) ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

No.

C 08-1519 BZ

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE ORDER

Last Day for Defendant to File Motion for Summary Judgment on the Ground that it is not a Proper Party: Monday, 9/29/08 Last Day for Plaintiff to seek leave to Amend Complaint to Bring New Claims: Monday, 12/1/2008 Close of Class Certification Discovery: Wednesday, 12/31/2008 1

Case 3:08-cv-01519-BZ

Document 26

Filed 07/01/2008

Page 2 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Hearing on Motion for Class Certification: Wednesday, 3/4/2009, 10:00 a.m. Further Status Conference: Monday, 3/16/09, 4:00 p.m. 2. DISCLOSURE AND DISCOVERY The parties are reminded that a failure to voluntarily disclose information pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a) or to supplement disclosures or discovery responses pursuant to Rule 26(e) may result in exclusionary sanctions. Thirty days prior to the close of non-expert

discovery, lead counsel for each party shall serve and file a certification that all supplementation has been completed. In the event a discovery dispute arises, lead counsel for each party shall meet in person or, if counsel are outside the Bay Area, by telephone and make a good faith effort to resolve their dispute. Exchanging letters or telephone messages about The Court does not read

the dispute is insufficient.

subsequent positioning letters; parties shall instead make a contemporaneous record of their meeting using a tape recorder or a court reporter. In the event they cannot resolve their dispute, the parties must participate in a telephone conference with the Court before filing any discovery motions or other papers. The party seeking discovery shall request a conference in a letter filed electronically not exceeding two pages (with no attachments) which briefly explains the nature of the action and the issues in dispute. Other parties shall reply in

similar fashion within two days of receiving the letter requesting the conference. The Court will contact the parties 2

Case 3:08-cv-01519-BZ

Document 26

Filed 07/01/2008

Page 3 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

to schedule the conference. 3. MOTIONS Consult Civil Local Rules 7-1 through 7-5 and this Court's standing orders regarding motion practice. Motions

for summary judgment shall be accompanied by a statement of the material facts not in dispute supported by citations to admissible evidence. The parties shall file a joint statement If the parties are unable

of undisputed facts where possible.

to reach complete agreement after meeting and conferring, they shall file a joint statement of the undisputed facts about which they do agree. Any party may then file a separate

statement of the additional facts that the party contends are undisputed. A party who without substantial justification

contends that a fact is in dispute is subject to sanctions. A Chambers copy of all briefs shall be e-mailed in WordPerfect or Word format to the following address: [email protected]. 4. MEDIATION By agreement of the parties, this matter has been referred for a Mediation to be conducted November 3 - 4, 2008, if possible. The parties shall promptly notify the Court

whether the case is resolved at the Mediation. Dated: July 1, 2008 Bernard Zimmerman United States Magistrate Judge
G:\BZALL\-BZCASES\TAYLOR V. PANERA BREAD\CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE ORDER.wpd

3