Case 5:08-cr-00183-JF
Document 9
Filed 03/31/2008
Page 1 of 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO (CASBN 44332) United States Attorney BRIAN J. STRETCH (CASBN 163973) Chief, Criminal Division BENJAMIN T. KENNEDY (CASBN 241350) Assistant United States Attorney 150 Almaden Boulevard San Jose, California 95113 Telephone: (408) 535-5059 Facsimile: (408) 535-5066 Email: [email protected] Attorneys for the United States of America
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Defendant. 19 20 21 The parties stipulate that the time between March 25, 2008 and April 23, 2008 is excluded 22 under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. §3161, and agree that the failure to grant the requested 23 continuance would unreasonably deny defense counsel reasonable time necessary for effective 24 preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. Finally, the parties agree that the 25 ends of justice served by granting the requested continuance outweigh the best interest of the 26 public, and the defendant in a speedy trial and in the prompt disposition of criminal cases. 27 28 // 1 v. ELVIS FABRICIO SANDOVALCORONA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CR 08-00183 JF UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXCLUDING TIME FROM MARCH 25, 2008 TO APRIL 23, 2008 FROM THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT CALCULATION (18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A))
Case 5:08-cr-00183-JF
Document 9
Filed 03/31/2008
Page 2 of 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(8)(A).
DATED: March 26, 2008
JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO United States Attorney __/s/___________________________________ BENJAMIN T. KENNEDY Assistant United States Attorney
____/s/_________________________________ CARLEEN ARLIDGE Attorney for Defendant
2
Case 5:08-cr-00183-JF
Document 9
Filed 03/31/2008
Page 3 of 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED:
ORDER Based upon the stipulation of the parties, and for good cause shown, the Court HEREBY ORDERS that the time between March 25, 2008 and April 23, 2008 is excluded under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. §3161. The court finds that the failure to grant the requested continuance would unreasonably deny defense counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. Furthermore, the Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting the requested continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial and in the prompt disposition of criminal cases. The court therefore concludes that this exclusion of time should be made under 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(8)(A).
_______________________________________ PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
3