Free Order Relating Case - District Court of California - California


File Size: 107.6 kB
Pages: 2
Date: March 19, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 416 Words, 2,364 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/201545/5.pdf

Download Order Relating Case - District Court of California ( 107.6 kB)


Preview Order Relating Case - District Court of California
Case 3:08-cv-01132-MHP

Document 5

Filed 03/19/2008

Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RELATED CASE ORDER A Motion for Administrative Relief to Consider Whether Cases Should be Related or a Sua Sponte Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship (Civil L.R. 3-12) has been filed. The time for filing an opposition or statement of support has passed. As the judge assigned to the earliest filed case below that bears my initials, I find that the more recently filed case(s) that I have initialed below are related to the case assigned to me, and such case(s) shall be reassigned to me. Any cases listed below that are not related to the case assigned to me are referred to the judge assigned to the next-earliest filed case for a related case determination. C 07-06140 MHP C 07-06347 MHP C 08-01132 PVT
Eichenholtz v. Verifone Holdings, Inc. Et al

King v. Bergeron et al
I find that the above case is related to the case assigned to me _MHP_

Hilborn v. Verifone Holdings, Inc. Et al

I find that the above case is related to the case assigned to me. _MHP_

C 08-01133 HRL

Patel v. Bergeron et al

I find that the above case is related to the case assigned to me. _MHP_

C 08-01301 RS

Lemmond et al v. Verifone Holdings, Inc. Et al

I find that the above case is related to the case assigned to me. __MHP__

ORDER Counsel are instructed that all future filings in any reassigned case are to bear the initials of the newly assigned judge immediately after the case number. Any case management conference in any reassigned case will be rescheduled by the Court. The parties shall adjust the dates for the conference, disclosures and report required by FRCivP 16 and 26 accordingly. Unless otherwise ordered, any dates for hearing noticed motions are vacated and must be renoticed by the moving party before the newly assigned judge; any deadlines set by the ADR Local Rules remain in effect; and any deadlines established in a case management order continue to govern, except dates for appearance in court, which will be rescheduled by the newly assigned judge.

-1-

Case 3:08-cv-01132-MHP

Document 5

Filed 03/19/2008

Page 2 of 2

Dated:_3/18/2008_ Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Dated:________________ Chief Magistrate Judge Patricia V. Trumbull

Dated:________________ Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd

-2-