Free Order Referring Case to Private ADR - District Court of California - California

Case 3:08-cv-01219-CRB

Document 18

Filed 05/20/2008

Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DAVID KECK

CASE NO. 08-1219 (CRB) Plaintiff(s), v.
BANK OF AMERICA, CENTRAL STATES INDEMNITY OF OMAHA, CSI PROCESSING LLC, ET AL

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

Defendant(s). _______________________________/ Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: 9 Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) 9 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) 9 Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) (Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) Private Process: JAMS mediation. 1 day. 9 Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________
Mediator and timing to be determined by agreement of the parties, who request 90 days after Rule 26 disclosures

to identify mediator and set mediation date. _____________________________________________________________________________

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 9 the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. ) 9
To be determined, but prior to filing motion for class certification other requested deadline _____________________________________________

5/16/08 Dated:___________

/s/ Peter Fredman ____________________________ Attorney for Plaintiff /s/ Jan T. Chilton ____________________________ Attorney for Defendant
/s/ Paul E. Gaspari

5/16/08 Dated:____________

Dated: 5/16/08

_________________________________ Attorney for Defendant

Case 3:08-cv-01219-CRB

Document 18

Filed 05/20/2008

Page 2 of 2

[PROPOSED] ORDER Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to: 9 Non-binding Arbitration 9 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) 9 Mediation 9 X Private ADR Deadline for ADR session 9 90 days from the date of this order. X other ___________________ 9 IT IS SO ORDERED.

UNIT ED

S

S DISTRICT TE C TA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT E

RN

F D IS T IC T O R

A

C

LI

FO

May 20, 2008 Dated:________________

reyer les R. B ge Char ___________________________________ Jud

JUDGE

R NIA

O ORD IT IS S

ERED

RT U O

NO

RT

H