Free Order - District Court of California - California

Case 3:08-cr-00043-SI

Document 17 16

05/05/2008 Filed 05/01/2008

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO (CASBN 44332) United States Attorney BRIAN J. STRETCH (CASBN 163973) Chief, Criminal Division JEFFREY R. FINIGAN (CASBN 168285) Assistant United States Attorney 450 Golden Gate Avenue San Francisco, California 94102 Telephone: (415) 436-7232 Facsimile: (415) 436-7234 Email: [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DMITRI GLAZNIKOV, Defendant.

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Criminal No. CR 08-0043 SI

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXCLUDING TIME

The above-captioned matter came before the Court on April 25, 2008, for status. The defendant was represented by Anthony Brass, Esq., and the government was represented by Jeffrey Finigan, Assistant United States Attorney. The matter was continued to August 25, 2008, in this Court for jury trial. The Court made a finding that the time from and including April 25, 2008, through August 25, 2008, should be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A), because the ends of justice served by taking such action outweighed the best interest of the public
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXCLUDING TIME CR 08-0043 SI

Case 3:08-cr-00043-SI

Document 17 16

05/05/2008 Filed 05/01/2008

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

and the defendant in a speedy trial. The finding was based on the need for the defendant to have reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence, and for continuity of counsel pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv). The parties hereby agree to and request that the case be continued until August 25, 2008, and that the exclusion of time until then be granted. The parties agree and stipulate that the additional time is appropriate and necessary under Title 18, United States Code, § 3161(h)(8)(A), because the ends of justice served by this continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. This time exclusion will allow defense counsel to effectively prepare, taking into account the exercise of due diligence, and will provide for continuity of counsel for the defendant.

DATED: April 28, 2008

/s/ ANTHONY BRASS Counsel for Dmitri Glaznikov

DATED: April 28, 2008

/s/ JEFFREY FINIGAN Assistant U.S. Attorney

So ordered. DATED: SUSAN ILLSTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXCLUDING TIME CR 08-0043 SI

2