Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Amend - District Court of California - California

Case 5:07-cv-05731-PVT

Document 14 15

Filed 06/30/2008 07/01/2008

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4

ADAM WANG, bar No. 201233 LAW OFFICES OF ADAM WANG 12 South First Street, Suite 613 San Jose, CA 95113 Tel: (408) 292-1040 Fax: (408) 416-0248 [email protected] Attorney for Plaintiffs

5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR DISTRICT OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA MING-GUI LI, CHI-POE HSUEH, KING Case No.: C07-5731 PVT ORDER GRANTING KENUNG LAM, GUAN YU LI, YEN SHIUNG HUANG PLAINTIFFS' SECOND MOTION TO CONTINUE THE DEADLINE TO FILE THE Plaintiffs, MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT vs. OKRA Inc., dba CAFE OPHELIA, HSIU YUN HUANG, does 1-10 Defendants Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-3, Plaintiffs move to continue the current deadline to file motion for leave to file the amended complaint as follows: 1. On May 7, 2008, this Court continued the deadline to file the motion for lave to

amend the Complaint to June 30, 2008. 2. 3. Plaintiffs counsel has calendared the date and planed his schedule accordingly. However, in another case Balarezo v. Nth Connect Telecom Inc. (C07-05243

JF(PVT)) where Plaintiffs' counsel filed a motion to compel defendants there to produce documents concerning all putative class members in that case. The hearing was scheduled on July 1, 2008, but Defendants there unexpectedly filed an unauthorized Sure-Reply on June 25, 2008. As such Plaintiffs counsel was forced to spend much of the later part of the last week and this past weekend to draft a response. This unexpected task has taken up the time origninally planned for this matter. 1 C07-5731 PVT MOTION TO CONTINUE DEADLINE TO FILE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT Li, et al v. Okra Inc. et al.

Case 5:07-cv-05731-PVT

Document 14 15

Filed 06/30/2008 07/01/2008

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

4.

While Plaintiffs' counsel has tried to meet the deadline to file the motion for leave

to amend by the midnight tonight; it seems unlikely that he would be able to do so. 5. As such, Plaintiffs' counsel hereby respectfully requests a one-day continuance to

allow Plaintiffs file the motion for leave to amend by July 1, 2008. I declare under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is true and accurate. DATED: June 30, 2008 By: /s/ Adam Wang ADAM WANG Attorneys for Plaintiffs

IT IS SO ORDERED.

10
Dated: July 1, 2008 ___________________________ Patricia V. Trumbull U.S. Magistrate Judge

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

2 C07-5731 PVT MOTION TO CONTINUE DEADLINE TO FILE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT Li, et al v. Okra Inc. et al.