Case 3:07-cv-02748-MHP
Document 198
Filed 05/06/2008
Page 1 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
WILLIAM R. HILL, #114954 [email protected] ANDREW S. MACKAY, #197074 [email protected] SARA J. ROMANO, #227467 [email protected] DONAHUE GALLAGHER WOODS LLP Attorneys at Law 300 Lakeside Drive, Suite 1900 Oakland, California 94612-3570 Mail: P.O. Box 12979 Oakland, California 94604-2979 Telephone: (510) 451-0544 Facsimile: (510) 832-1486 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant MARK LILLGE d/b/a CREATIVE MARKETING CONCEPTS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
MARK LILLGE d/b/a CREATIVE MARKETING CONCEPTS, Plaintiff,
CASE NO. C 07-02748 MHP STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
17 v. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
CASE NO. C 07-02748 MHP
ANDREW VERITY and CHRISTINA CHANG, Defendants. ANDREW VERITY and CHRISTINA CHANG, Counterclaimants, v. MARK LILLGE d/b/a CREATIVE MARKETING CONCEPTS, and DOES 110, Counterdefendant.
Case 3:07-cv-02748-MHP
Document 198
Filed 05/06/2008
Page 2 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1) and 41(c). Plaintiff/Counterdefendant Mark Lillge d/b/a Creative Marketing Concepts hereby dismisses his Complaint with prejudice. Defendants/Counterclaimants Andrew Verity and Christina Chang hereby dismiss their Counterclaim and Amended and Supplemental Counterclaim with prejudice. Each party will bear their own attorneys' fees and costs.
Dated: May 5, 2008
DONAHUE GALLAGHER WOODS LLP
By: ___________/s/____________________ Andrew S. MacKay Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterdefendant Mark Lillge d/b/a Creative Marketing Concepts Dated: May 5, 2008 SHARTSIS FRIESE LLP
15 16 17 18 19 20
By: ___________/s/____________________ Robert Charles Ward Attorneys for Defendants/Counterclaimants Andrew Verity and Christina Chang
22 23 24
5/6/2008
UNIT ED
S
21
S DISTRICT TE C TA
27 28 -1-
N
F D IS T IC T O R
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
A
26
ER
C
CASE NO. C 07-02748 MHP
LI
FO
25
arily Judge M
n H. Pa
tel
R NIA
O ORD IT IS S
ERED
RT U O
NO
RT
H