Free Letter - District Court of California - California

Case 3:07-cv—O2748—I\/IHP Document 150 Filed O3/26/2008 Page 1 of 1
D12 LA I—IousAYE 6B Assocmrias
A LAW CORPORATION
h5’$5’3JT€§S.ii EES? EQ2 §ZQ.?§%$§$RE§$'°E Y;2;'“.$TMiT.F'2.’§§§.§°‘
FIFTEENTH FLOOR TWENTY-SECOND FLOOR SUITE 395
March 26, 2008
VIA E-FILING &
FEDERAL EXPRESS
The Honorable Marilyn Hall Patel
United States District Court
Northern District of California
450 Golden Gate Avenue
Courtroom 15, 18th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94102
Re: Mark Lillge d/b/a Creative Marketing Concepts v. Andrew Verity, et al.
U.S. District Court Case No. C07-02748 MHP
Dear Judge Patel:
I am in receipt of Mr. MacKay’s letter of this morning. The Defendants also have
a discovery dispute that requires your attention. I have attached hereto briefing regarding
Defendants’ need for Plaintiff to identify with "reasonable particularity" his claimed
trade secrets. Resolution of this issue appears to be a prerequisite to resolution of the
issue raised in Mr. MacKay’s letter, pursuant to the language of California Code of Civil
Procedure §2019.2l0.
I am available all day Thursday and am available through the early aftemoon on
Friday, but need to depart for a prepaid vacation with my children by 3:00 p.m. on
Friday, March 25, 2008. I will return on April 9, 2008 but my co-counsel Richard
Harrington will also be available next week if the proposed timing does not fit with the
Court’s schedule.
Thank you in advance for your consideration of this matter.
Very truly yours, we
Mm§_m_,_ .,_,w,,._...,w,.Nm~» ,,,, W ,, N _ V
.»»·m*"'“ r . .
#F,..»~',» 1 wif?/W s 5;}*
I V" f;~/if
,.i;at??*” Brendan J. Dooléif, ESq·
diii ’,»#*"/’» i\.. . ..... ..,,.. . ...,._.. . ,. .... ...... »»-~»··==»~*"""f
BJD:mss A
cc: all counsel
Enclosures

Case 3:07-cv-02748-MHP

Document 150

Filed 03/26/2008

Page 1 of 1