Ftziég R
1
2 ``` l if
3 L if F: fi,
4 ti »» .
5 .
6
7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
9 United States of America, l
No. CR—04-1259-PHX-DGC
10 Plaintiff,
7 1 1 v. O R D E R
12 David Reyes, (Fourth Request)
13 Defendant.
14 Upon motion ofthe defendant, the government having no objection and
15 good cause appearing, l
16 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the defendant’s Motion to Continue
17 Trial and Pretrial Motion Filing Deadline is granted pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
18 §3l6l(h)(8)(A). This court specifically finds that the ends of justice served by
19 granting a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in
21) a speedy trial. This finding is based on the court's conclusion that the failure to grant
21 such a continuance would unreasonably deny the defendant the reasonable time
22 necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.
23 18 U.S.C. § 3l6l(h)(8)(b)(IV).
24 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED continuing the trial of this case from
25 August 9, 2005 to flgglggkxg I | , 2005, at 0t'.C>D
26 am?. C
27 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED extending the current pretrial motions
28 deadline to , 2005.
Case 2:04-cr—O1259-DGC Document 46 Filed 08/O1/2005 Page 1 of 2
"T**'______T
1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED vacating the status conference currently
2 set for August 1, 2005 at 10:00 a.m.
3 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that excludable delay under 18 U.S.C. §
4 316l(h) [$)(Q| will commence on °5 la ii for a total 015% days.
5 I DATED this Eday of ~7· Q} , 2005.
6 .
7 2.....% £.—,~f/f
8 United States District Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19 I
20
21
i 22
23
24
25
26
27
28 2
Case 2:04-cr—O1259-DGC Document 46 Filed 08/O1/2005 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:04-cr-01259-DGC
Document 46
Filed 08/01/2005
Page 1 of 2
Case 2:04-cr-01259-DGC
Document 46
Filed 08/01/2005
Page 2 of 2