Free Order on Motion for Release from Custody - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Richard Nail, 13 Defendant. 14 15 16 The court has before it a letter dated August 1, 2008, from the defendant which the 17 court construes as a motion for early termination of supervised release (doc. 330), and the 18 United States's "Response"(doc. 331). Also before the court is a memorandum dated 19 September 9, 2008, from Greg Luethans, Probation Officer, recommending that the 20 defendant remain on supervised release with the understanding that he may resubmit his 21 request for early termination on or after January 2009. 22 Both the probation officer in Florida and in Arizona believe that until the defendant 23 has served at least one­half of his term of supervised release, it is premature to terminate it. 24 While it is understandable that the defendant would like to get on with his life, we 25 think the probation officers' recommendation that the defendant reapply after January 2009, 26 is a reasonable one. 27 28
Case 2:04-cr-00820-FJM Document 332 Filed 09/18/2008 Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America, Plaintiff, vs.

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

CR 04-0820-PHX-FJM ORDER

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED DENYING the defendant's request for early termination of supervised release, but without prejudice to reapply after January 2009. DATED this 18th day of September, 2008.

-2Case 2:04-cr-00820-FJM Document 332 Filed 09/18/2008 Page 2 of 2