Free Motion for Miscellaneous Relief - District Court of Arizona - Arizona


File Size: 19.3 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Arizona
Category: District Court of Arizona
Author: unknown
Word Count: 430 Words, 2,809 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/azd/35036/59.pdf

Download Motion for Miscellaneous Relief - District Court of Arizona ( 19.3 kB)


Preview Motion for Miscellaneous Relief - District Court of Arizona
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

John E. Karow, SBN 014200 LAW OFFICE OF JOHN E. KAROW 11350 North 104th Place Scottsdale, Arizona 85259 (480) 391-2236 Attorneys for Defendant IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA LINDA HINTON, an individual, Plaintiff, vs. PROGUARD SECURITY, an Arizona corporation, Defendant. _____________________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CIV 03-1985-PHX-SRB

DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO NOTICE AND MOTION FILED BY PLAINTIFF (Assigned to the Hon. Susan R. Bolton) (Oral Argument Requested)

Defendant ProGuard Security ("Defendant") responds partly in support and partly in opposition to the July 25, 2005, "Notice to Court" filed by Plaintiff Linda Hinton ("Plaintiff") on the subjects of the requests by the Plaintiff to extend the time for discovery and the request by Defendant to extend the time for filing Motions for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff, despite being represented by competent counsel at the time the discovery deadline passed has asked the Court to extend the time for her to conduct additional discovery. Based on Plaintiff's request, Defendant previously asked the Court to extend the time to file Motions for Summary Judgment to a reasonable time after Plaintiff completes any period for additional discovery granted by the Court. Defendant objects to the granting of Plaintiff's request on the grounds of fairness since an extension of discovery allows Plaintiff the opportunity to identify new witnesses and information requiring further depositions and evaluation of evidence by

Case 2:03-cv-01985-SRB

Document 59

Filed 08/15/2005

Page 1 of 2

Defendant without allowing Defendant to make an appropriate response by motion. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Original filed this 15th day of August, 2005, with: Clerk of the District Court Sandra Day O'Connor U.S. Courthouse 401 West Washington Street Phoenix, AZ 85003 and, COPY HAND DELIVERED TO: Hon. Susan R. Bolton Judge of the District Court Sandra Day O'Connor U.S. Courthouse 401 West Washington Street Phoenix, AZ 85003 and, COPY mailed this 15th day of August, 2005, to: Linda Hinton 2015 North 37th Place Phoenix, AZ 85008 Plaintiff pro per ________________________ Defendant suggests that because Plaintiff is unrepresented an extension of both deadlines is reasonable in the interests of assuring that Plaintiff has the opportunity to present her case and that Defendant has the opportunity to fully defend itself. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, this 15th day of August, 2005. LAW OFFICE OF JOHN E. KAROW _________________________________ John E. Karow 11350 North 104th Place Scottsdale, Arizona 85259 Attorney for Defendant

Case 2:03-cv-01985-SRB

Document259

Filed 08/15/2005

Page 2 of 2