USCA DOCKET # (IF KNOWN)
éwri ·i°~i%7
{Ti tuirilif M ·<>(
§i'l@;,¢7*gQI.-»Ejt;i;1·
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTII CIRCUIT
CIVIL APPEALS DOCKETING STATEMENT
A SE ATTA ‘ D 7 IV..V.,II. I.,. 7 ..V,V,V.».»,VV 7 77 IIIV.I 7 ,,., III. 7 77 IIIIII 7 II,»II 7
TITLE IN FULL: DISTRICT: Afjzgng JUDGE: Paul G_ RgS€_nb]_a1;1; ;
Securities and Exchange G0mmiSSiC>H o1srR1crcouRTNuMeeR: CV 03-1825-PHX-PGR
Plaintiff, DATE Notice or APPEAL D
I v_ I FILED: Sgptgnbgf 17, IS THIS /\CROS$·/\I°I’E/\L? ______ YES
I ,............., 7 ..., i77.7 r.,,,, 7 ..,. 7 ..,..,. r...... 77i ....,,,, - ..,,....,. . 7 ..,..,. 7,7 ....... ,..,, -7
I IF THIS MATTER HAS BEEN BEFORE THIS COURT PREVIOUSLY.
Ronald Stephen Holt, at T]`° ' i PLEASE PROVIDE THE DOCKET NUMBER AND CITATION (IF ANY):
I 7.7.7 7777 77 77777 77.7. 7:7...7..:. 7 ,:.77:7.7.777:77 77 7777 777.!»:777 l 7 7 77 7 77 7777777 77 7777 7 7777 7 77777 7 777777777 7 7777 7 777777777 7 777777..7.7 77 77 77 7777 7. 7777777 I
I BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF NATURE OF ACTION AND RESULT BELOW:
The court—appointed.receiver brought an action against the Respondent to
( distribute the holdings of a series of trusts. The District Court granted
judgment in favor of the receiver, and denied Respondent's Motion for New
I Trial and/or to Alter or Amend Judgment. I
PRINCIPAL ISSUES PROPOSED TO BE RAISED ON APPEAL:
Whether the District Court exceeded its jurisdiction in granting judgment
when the receiver lacked standing to assert the claims of third—parties.
I PLEASE IDENTIFY ANY OTHER LEGAL PROCEEDING THAT MAY HAVE A BEARING ON THIS CASE (INCLUDE A
i PENDING DISTRICT COURT POSTJUDGM ENT MOTIONS):
Unknown I
1 DOES THIS APPEAL INVOLVE ANY OF THE FOLLOWING: {
Q Possibility of settlement
I Q Likelihood that intervening precedent will control outcome of appeal
I Q Likelihood of a motion to expedite or to stay the appeal, or other procedural matters (Specify)
I I
, Q Any other information relevant to the inclusion of this case in the Mediation Program
L
I Possi il ty pa ie ould sti ate to binding award by Appellate Commissioner in lieu of submission to judges (
I LOWER COURT INFORMATION
Case 2:03-cv-01825-PGFI Document 352 Filed O9/17/2007 Paget of2
Page 2 0I` 2 I
2 2,2/2 2 22.2, 2 I RISD C TI 2 2222 2 2. 2 .2 222222_ 22 22_2 22222 2222222 22 222222 2 222222222222222222222222222
FEDERAL APPELLATE TYPE OF JUDGMENT/ORDER APPEALED I RELIEF
I 2 I I
I Q FEDERAL Q FINAL DECISION OF Q DEFAULT JUDGMENT Q DAMAGES:
I QUESTION I DISTRICT COURT I SOUGHT gg
2 Q DISMISSAL/JURISDICTION AWARDED III
Q. DIVERSITY B Q INTEI
` 2 AS OF RIGHT I ____ SUMMARY JUDGMENT 2 pRELIMINARy 2
2 Q OTHER E] ’*
(SPECIFY}: I JUDGMENT/COURT DECISION D 2 I
Q INTERLOCUTORY 2 _" I ’_ PERMANENT
I DRDER CERTIFIED EY I] JUDGMENT/IURY vEIzI>1c"r I I] E
I DISTRICT IUDGE _ "‘ GRANTED
(SPECIFY); I Q Ii>EcEAI2AT0Iw JUDGMENT _I;I_ DENIED I
I Q .IUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW :
Q 2 Q OTIIIER I I Q ATTORNEY FEES: j
ISPECIFYI2 _%_ulOTIA§§(;2I¤I?2IFYiI: Denial 0f SOUGI-ITS
1 G O mn ; AWARDED I;
I l Q PENDING
. , I I
2 Z _I;I__ COSTS: II
I I ’ I =
i I
I CERTIFICATION OF COUNSEL I
I ICERTIFY THAT:
I. COPIES OF ORDER/JUDGMENT APPEALED FROM ARE ATTACHED. I
I 2. A CURRENT SERVICE LIST OR REPRESENTATION STATEMENT WITI·I TELEPHONE AND FAX NUMBERS IS ATTACHED (SEE 9TH
CIR. RULE 3-2).
3. A COPY OF THIS CIVIL APPEALS DOCKETING STATEMENT WAS SERVED IN COMPLIANCE WITH FRAP 25.
4. I UNDERSTAND THAT FAILURE TO COMPLY WITII THESE FILING REQUIREMENTS MAY RESULT IN SANCTIONS, I
I INCLUDING DISMISSAL O ' ~ S APPEAL. g ' I
I I ‘
I Signature Date I
COUNSEL WHO COMPLETED THIS FORM
NAME: Brian A. Hatch
FIRI/I¢ Brian A. Hatch PLLC
ADDRESS 1423 S. Higley Rd. , Suite II0
I Mesa AZ 85206
_ E-MMD brian hatchle .2 2 a
TELEPHONE: 48D_633_8»IDD I
.... 2..2 2222 .222222 22.22_2 ..22... 222 222.222222.2.2.2.22.22.2222222 2.222. ...2.22.2.22.2....2..22 .222.222.222222222..22..2222 ...2 .222 2.2.22222 . .2.222.2222 2222.2222.222 2.22222.2222.2 22222222_2 22.2.22.22. 22222.22..222.22 222.2..2 222 2..22.222222 2 2222222 2222222_ .2_. 2 2 22._22 . 2222222..222222222 2 2..22222
#=THIS DOCUMENT SHOULD BE FILED IN THE DISTRICT COURT WITH THE NOTICE OF APPEAL=I(<
2 >I(¤IF FILED LATE, IT SHOULD BE FILED DIRECTLY WITH THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS¤II=
Case 2:03-cv-01825-PGFI Document 352 Filed O9/17/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:03-cv-01825-PGR
Document 352
Filed 09/17/2007
Page 1 of 2
Case 2:03-cv-01825-PGR
Document 352
Filed 09/17/2007
Page 2 of 2
United States Free Forms
Canada Free Forms
United Kingdom Free Forms
Australia Free Forms