Free Mandate of 9th Circuit - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, N0. 04-10431
D.C. No. CR—03-00672-EHC
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
AMENDED JUDGMENT
TRAVIS LEE KISTO,
‘ Defendant — Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona
(Phoenix).
On consideration whereof, it is now here ordered and adjudged by this
Court, that the appeal in this cause be, and herebyare DISMISSED.
Filed and entered 06/ 17/05
A more
3/2l'&"é£`;g”ill\lE“S°N
Arrizsr Owl
JUL Z 9 zunsi
e » __
' Deputy Clerk
Case 2:03—cr—00672-EHC Document 45 Filed 07/29/2005 Page 1 of 3

Nor Fon PUBL1cAr1oN JUN 17 2005
UNITED STATES count or APPEALS °“T'0Y¥·Jé$3·i%T¤'i·;°$"¤?P°·?¤°l'éERK
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT _
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 04-10431
Plaintiff- Appellee, D.C. No. CR-03-00672-EHC
v. I
MEMORANDUM *
TRAVIS LEE KISTO,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
Earl H. Carroll., District Judge, Presiding
Submitted Jtme 14, 2005**
Before: KLEINFELD, TASHIMA and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Travis Lee Kisto appeals the district court’s judgment imposing a 30—month
sentence following his guilty—plea conviction for unlawful possession of a firearm
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited
to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ·
J" This panel unanimously rinds this case suitable for decision without
. oral argtunent. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Case 2:03—cr—00672-EHC Document 45 Filed 07/29/2005 Page 2 of 3 _ `

in violation of 26 U.S.C. §§ 5861 (d) and 5871. We have jurisdiction pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1291.
We dismiss in light ofthe valid written appeal waiver. See United States v.
Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir. 2000) (stating that an appeal waiver is valid
when it is entered knowingly and voluntarily); United States v. Cardenas, 405 F.3d
1046, 1048 (9th Cir. 2005) (holding that the changes in sentencing law imposed by
United States v. Booker, 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005), did not render waiver of appeal
involuntary and unknowing). ~ I
DISMISSED.
é/1·iilLi’E.¢€CC)E1YYERSON
2%-*`鑧€‘°"""ot .
sui 2 s 20115
2 i V __ A
l by: a u Clerk l 4
Case 2:03—cr—00672-EHC Document 45 Filed 07/29/2005 Page 3 of 3

Case 2:03-cr-00672-EHC

Document 45

Filed 07/29/2005

Page 1 of 3

Case 2:03-cr-00672-EHC

Document 45

Filed 07/29/2005

Page 2 of 3

Case 2:03-cr-00672-EHC

Document 45

Filed 07/29/2005

Page 3 of 3