Free Pleadings from Other Distict - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 40.0 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 28, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 438 Words, 2,679 Characters
Page Size: 622 x 792 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/39522/1.pdf

Download Pleadings from Other Distict - District Court of Delaware ( 40.0 kB)


Preview Pleadings from Other Distict - District Court of Delaware
, R Case 1 :07-mj—OO256—UNA Document 1 Filed 12/28/2007 Page 1 of 2 I
n ~ _ Case 1:07-or-00094-IMK Document 1 Filed 09/ 1 2/2007 Page 1 of 2 I
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE E E L *‘“ D
. NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA SEP 1 2 2007
memo smrns or Amzmclt, jg? Gi:] "{‘?T’$`,iZ‘§i‘FF.,} t
· . ,_,,;¥L1&`..Zt.·-.·--J: *· ' """" _
Plaintiff,
Q. crimtma Ne. /7 0 7€·*'*·? Z V
Violations: 21 USC §841(¤](1)
- THOMAS CLANCY, _ , 21 USC § 841(b}(1)(C)
· 21 USC. § 853
Defendant _
I IC M. cy. $,01. or 06

l Ce Se N4: O7*?$`é‘m
The Grand Juxy charges that:
COQQQ ONE 1
On or about March 1, 2007, in Monongalie. County, within the Northam District of West I I
Virginia, the defendant, THOMAS CLAN CY , did unlawfully, knowingly, intentionally manufacture
50 or more marijumm plants, a Schedule Idrug controlled substance; in violation of Title 21, United L
States Code, §§·B41(e.}(1) and 841(b)(l)(C].
i
l
t
l
R l
l

_ , Case 1 :07-mj—OO256—UNA Document 1 Filed 12/28/2007 Page 2 of 2
gil . .- i
i case 1:07-cr-DOU94-IMK Document 1 ‘ Filed D9/12/2007 Page 2 of 2
I (Forfeiturc Allegatiou)
‘ 1. Pursuant to Title 21 section 853, upon obtaining a conviction with respect to an
alleged Controlled Substance Act ctfcnse, it is the intention ofthe United States to seek at sentencing
the forfeiture of any property that was used, or intended to he used, to commit or to facilitate the
commission of such offense, and any property, real or personal, that conslitutes or was derived fiom
proceeds traceable to such offense, including a residence located at #---—·- -—-- ——--·- --——- -·--,
. Morgantown, West Virginia. ,
2. lf any forfieitablc property, as a result of any mt or omission of a convicted defendant
(tt) cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence; fb) has been trartsfetted or sold to, or
deposited with, a third party; (c) has been placed beyond the jurisdiction of thc court; (ti) has been
substantially diminished in value; or (e) has been commingled with other property which cannot bc
divided without difficulty, it is the intent of the United States to seek the forfeiture of any properly
owned by any convicted defendant up to the value of the forfeitablc property described above. _
s ` A tmc bill,
[S!
Grand Jtuy Forepetson
_ (Signature on File)
lg; zen E, me tg Qt
SHARON L. PQTTER ·
United States Attorney
i

Case 1:07-mj-00256-UNA

Document 1

Filed 12/28/2007

Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-mj-00256-UNA

Document 1

Filed 12/28/2007

Page 2 of 2