Free Answer to Counterclaim - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:07-cv-00651-GMS

Document 42

Filed 02/11/2008

Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE NETCRAFT CORPORATION, Plaintiff,
V.

C.A. No. 07-651 (GMS) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

AT&T MOBILITY LLC, BOOST MOBILE, LLC, CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION, and T-MOBILE USA, INC.,

Defendants.

NETCRAFT CORPORATION ' S REPLY TO COUNTERCLAIMS OF T-MOBILE USA, INC. Netcraft Corporation replies to the counterclaims of T-Mobile USA, Inc. as follows. Except as expressly admitted below, Netcraft denies each and every allegation in Defendant's counterclaims: JURISDICTION AND VENUE 1. 2. 3. Netcraft admits the allegations of paragraph 36 of the counterclaims. Netcraft admits the allegations of paragraph 37 of the counterclaims. Netcraft admits that this Court has subject matter jurisdiction over the

counterclaims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1338 and 1367. It notes, however, that 28 U.S.C. § § 2201 and 2202 are not statutes that confer subject matter jurisdiction-they simply create an additional remedy that a Court may issue in cases over which another part of Title 28 establishes subject matter jurisdiction. Likewise, the Patent Laws, 35 U.S.C. § 1, et seq. do not contain a provision that confers subject matter jurisdiction. Therefore, Netcraft must respectfully deny that the Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to these statutes. 4. Netcraft admits the allegations of paragraph 39 of the counterclaims

Case 1:07-cv-00651-GMS

Document 42

Filed 02/11/2008

Page 2 of 5

5.

Netcraft admits the allegations of paragraph 40 of the counterclaims FIRST COUNTERCLAIM

6.

In response to paragraph 41 of the counterclaims, Netcraft incorporates its

responses to paragraphs 36 to 40 of the counterclaims by reference here. 7. 8. Netcraft admits the allegations of paragraph 42 of the counterclaims. Netcraft denies the allegations of paragraph 43 of the counterclaims. SECOND COUNTERCLAIM 9. In response to paragraph 44 of the counterclaims, Netcraft incorporates its

responses to paragraphs 36 to 43 of the counterclaims by reference here. 10. 11. Netcraft admits the allegations of paragraph 45 of the counterclaims. Netcraft denies the allegations of paragraph 46 of the counterclaims. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Netcraft prays for judgment: A. B. C. nd D. Granting to Netcraft such other and further relief as may be just and appropriate. DEMAND FOR A JURY TRIAL Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 38(b), Netcraft demands a trial by jury on all issues so triable. Dismissing T-Mobile's counterclaims with prejudice; Granting judgment to Netcraft on the counterclaim; Awarding to Netcraft its costs and attorneys' fees pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285;

2

Case 1:07-cv-00651-GMS

Document 42

Filed 02/11/2008

Page 3 of 5

Dated: February 11, 2008

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

By: Ti^thy Dvlin (#4141) K le Wag r Compton (#4693) 919 N. Market St., Suite 1100 P.O. Box 1114 Wilmington, DE 19899-1114 tdevlin e ,fr.com [email protected] Tel: (302) 652-5070 Fax: (302) 652-0607 Frank E. Scherkenbach Craig R. Smith FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 225 Franklin Street Boston, MA 02110 Tel: (617) 542-5070 Fax: (617) 542-8906 Michael J. Kane William R. Woodford FISH & RICHARDSON P.C., P.A. 3300 Dain Rauscher Plaza 60 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 Tel: (612) 335-5070 Fax: (612) 288-9696 Attorneys for Plaintiff NETCRAFT CORPORATION
10807611.doc

3

Case 1:07-cv-00651-GMS

Document 42

Filed 02/11/2008

Page 4 of 5

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on February 11, 2008, I electronically filed with the Clerk of Court NETCRAFT CORPORATION'S REPLY TO COUNTERCLAIMS OF T-MOBILE USA, INC. using CM/ECF which will send electronic notification of such filing(s) to the following Delaware counsel . In addition the filing will also be sent via electronic mail: Mary B. Graham James W. Parrett, Jr. Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell LLP Chase Manhattan Centre 1201 North Market Street, Suite 1800 Wilmington, DE 19801 mbgeservicegmnat.com Steven J. Balick John G. Day Lauren E. Maguire Ashby & Geddes 500 Delaware Avenue, 8th Floor Wilmington, DE 19801 sbalick l ashby-geddes.com [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Richard L. Horwitz David E. Moore Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP 1313 N. Market Street, 6th floor Wilmington, DE 19801 rhorwitz(c,,potteranders on. com [email protected] I hereby certify that on February 11, 2008, I have mailed by electronic mail, the document(s) to the following non-registered participants: Josh A. Krevitt John L. LaBarre Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 200 Park Avenue New York, NY 10166-0193 Jkrevittggib sondunn.com jlabarre@gib sondunn.com Kevin X. McGann White & Case LLP 1155 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036 [email protected] Frederick L. Cottrell, III Anne Shea Gaza Richards Layton & Finger One Rodney Square Wilmington, DE 19801 [email protected] gazagrlf.com Warren S. Heit White & Case LLP 3000 El Camino Real 5 Palo Alto Square, 10th Floor Palo Alto, CA 94306 [email protected]

Case 1:07-cv-00651-GMS

Document 42

Filed 02/11/2008

Page 5 of 5

H. Jonathan Redway Dickinson Wright PLLC 1901 L. Street, N.W. Suite 800 Washington, DC 20036 d're dway a,dickinsonwright.com James L. Wamsley, II Jones Day North Point 901 Lakeside Avenue Cleveland, OH 44114-1190 [email protected]

Michael A. Schaldenbrand Dickinson Wright PLLC 38525 Woodward Avenue Suite 2000 Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304-2970 mschaldenbrand(a^,dickinsonwrig t.com h Mark V. Campagna Jones Day 1420 Peachtree Street, N.E., Suite 800 Atlanta, GA 30309-3053 mcanipagnaQjonesday.com