Free Plea Agreement - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

` Case 1:07-cr—00122-GIVIS Document 12 Filed 11/07/2007 Page 1 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )
Plaintiff i
v. ) Criminal Action No. 07-122-GMS
JOHN PATRICK GRAMLICH, i
Defendant. g
MEMORANDUM OF PLEA AGREEMENT
Pursuant to discussions between the United States of America, by and through its attorneys,
Edmond Falgowski, Assistant United States Attorney for the District of Delaware, and Colm F.
Comrolly, United States Attorney for the District of Delaware, and the defendant, John Patrick
Gramlich, by and through the defendant's attorney, Luis Ortiz, Esquire, the following agreement is
hereby entered into by the respective parties:
l. The defendant shall enter a guilty plea to Count 2 of the Indictment, charging Receipt of
Child Pornography, a violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 2252A(a)(2) and (b)(l), which
carries a maximum penalty of not less than 5 years imprisonment and not more than 20 years
imprisonment, a $250,000.00 fine, a life term of supervised release, or any or all of the above, and a
special assessment of $ 1 00. At sentencing the United States will move to dismiss the remaining counts
of the Indictment.
2. The defendant acknowledges that the elements of the offense are as follows:
a. Acting knowingly
b. the defendant transmitted in interstate commerce

I Case 1:07-cr—00122-GIVIS Document 12 Filed 11/07/2007 Page 2 of 3
c. child pornography, defined as a visual depiction of a minor engaged in an actual
or simulated sex act and/or the lascivious exhibition ofthe genitals or public area.
The defendant admits that on or about January 11, 2006, he downloaded over the Intemet a video
depicting child pornography.
3. The defendant agrees to pay the special assessment on the day of sentencing. If the Court
orders the payment of any fine as part of the defendant’s sentence, the defendant agrees voluntarily to
enter the Inmate Financial Responsibility Program through which the Bureau of Prisons will collect a
portion of the defendant’s prison salary and apply it on the defendant’s behalf to the payment ofthe
outstanding debt ordered.
4. Provided that the United States does not subsequently leam of conduct by the defendant
inconsistent with acceptance of responsibility, the United States agrees to recommend at sentencing a
two-level reduction for acceptance of responsibility under U.S.S.G. § 3El.l(a). If the defendant’s
offense level is 16 or greater, the United States will move for an additional one point reduction,
pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3E1.l(a) and (b).
5. The defendant agrees to forfeit to the United States his interest in all computer hardware,
software, and storage media taken from the defendant’s home by ICE agents on or about August 28,
2007.
6. The defendant understands that the District Court must consider the United States Sentencing
Guidelines and the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. Section 3553(a) in determining an appropriate
sentence. At this stage (prior to the preparation ofthe pre-sentence report), the defendant should expect
that the Govermnent will recommend that the Court impose a sentence consistent with the sentencing
range set forth by the sentencing guidelines. The defendant understands, however, that the ultimate
determination of an appropriate sentence will be up to the sentencing judge. The Court may impose a
sentence which exceeds, falls below, or is contained within the sentencing range prescribed by the
sentencing guidelines. The defendant expressly acknowledges that if the Court imposes a sentence
2

Case 1:07-cr—00122-GIVIS Document 12 Filed 11/07/2007 Page 3 of 3
outside the range set forth in the sentencing guidelines, or otherwise different than the defendant
expected, or contrary to the recommendation of his attorney or the United States, the defendant will not
be allowed to withdraw his guilty plea on that basis.
7. lt is further agreed by the parties that this Memorandum supersedes all prior promises,
representations, and statements ofthe undersigned parties; that this Memorandum maybe modified only
in writing signed by all the parties; and that any and all promises, representations and statements made
prior to or after this Memorandum are null and void and have no effect whatsoever, unless they comport
with the subsequent written modification requirements of this paragraph.
COLM F. CONNOLLY i
Unit , tates Attorne
J { p [fi / `, yn fra '
. { p . I, //
uis Ortiz, Esquire ` dmond F algows ·' /y/’i
Attorney for Defendant Assistant United Stat ~ Attorney
dohn Patrick Gramlich, Defendant
Dated:,[’ 7 ’
T R
AND NOW this [ day of / QNX , 2007, the foregoing
Memorandum of Plea Agreement is hereby (accepted) Ltejoeted-)-by this Court.
HON§éRABE GREG;iRY M. SLEET Q
Chie udge, United States District Court
3

Case 1:07-cr-00122-GMS

Document 12

Filed 11/07/2007

Page 1 of 3

Case 1:07-cr-00122-GMS

Document 12

Filed 11/07/2007

Page 2 of 3

Case 1:07-cr-00122-GMS

Document 12

Filed 11/07/2007

Page 3 of 3