Free Claim Construction Chart - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 25.9 kB
Pages: 5
Date: September 7, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 679 Words, 4,304 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/38594/32.pdf

Download Claim Construction Chart - District Court of Delaware ( 25.9 kB)


Preview Claim Construction Chart - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:07-cv-00432-GMS

Document 32

Filed 07/11/2008

Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMA GMBH & CO. KG, DR. KARL THOMAE GMBH, BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM INTERNATIONAL GMBH, and BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Plaintiffs, v. BARR LABORATORIES, INC., Defendant.

C. A. No. 07-432-GMS

FINAL JOINT CLAIM CHART The parties have met and conferred, and present the following Final Joint Claim Chart with citations to intrinsic support pursuant to the Scheduling Order entered by the Court on January 11, 2008 (D.I. 17-2), as amended on May 14, 2008 (D.I. 29). The parties' Final Joint Claim Chart for U.S. Patent No. 6,015,577 is attached hereto as Exhibit A. This chart identifies the disputed claim terms, the parties' proposed constructions for the disputed claim terms, and the parties' identifications of the intrinsic evidence in support of their respective proposed constructions.

Case 1:07-cv-00432-GMS

Document 32

Filed 07/11/2008

Page 2 of 2

MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP

PHILLIPS, GOLDMAN & SPENCE, P.A.

/s/ Karen Jacobs Louden
Jack B. Blumenfeld (#1014) Karen Jacobs Louden (#2881) 1201 North Market Street P.O. Box 1347 Wilmington, DE 19899-1347 (302) 658-9200 [email protected] [email protected]

/s/ Brian E. Farnan
John C. Phillips, Jr. (#110) Brian E. Farnan (#4089) 1200 North Broom Street Wilmington, DE 19806 (302) 655-4200 [email protected] [email protected]

OF COUNSEL: OF COUNSEL: Bruce M. Wexler Joseph M. O'Malley, Jr. Eric W. Dittmann PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP 75 East 55th Street New York, NY 10022 (212) 318-6000 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Dated: July 11, 2008
2407900

George C. Lombardi Imron T. Aly Timothy M. Schaum WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 35 West Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60601 (312) 558-5600 Attorneys for Defendant

2

Case 1:07-cv-00432-GMS

Document 32-2

Filed 07/11/2008

Page 1 of 3

EXHIBIT A

Case 1:07-cv-00432-GMS

Document 32-2

Filed 07/11/2008

Page 2 of 3

Boehringer Ingelheim et al. v. Barr Laboratories, Inc. (Case No. 07-432-GMS) FINAL JOINT CLAIM CHART U.S. Patent No. 6,015,577 Boehringer Ingelheim's Proposed Construction the acid excipient is present with the first component in a single formulation Boehringer Ingelheim's Intrinsic Evidence '577 Patent, Col. 2:53-3:65; 4:38-5:11; 5:23-31; 9:63-13:16; 14:7-34 '577 Prosecution History Original Application 07/084,648 Application 08/421,351 Barr's Proposed Construction a pharmaceutically acceptable acid excipient mixed with said first component Barr's Intrinsic Evidence Claims 1, 2, 7, 8, 9, 10, 15 '577 Patent, Col. 2:1-3:65; 4:29-5:11; 9:63-13:17 '577 Prosecution History Original Application 07/084,648 Application 08/421,351 2-15-96 Response to Office Action 3-12-96 Response to Office Action 6-13-96 Office Action 9-9-96 Response to Office Action 11-5-96 Response to Office Action 12-4-98 Response to Office Action

Claim Term "a pharmaceutically acceptable acid excipient formulated together with said first component" (Claims 1-12)

-1-

Case 1:07-cv-00432-GMS

Document 32-2

Filed 07/11/2008

Page 3 of 3

Boehringer Ingelheim et al. v. Barr Laboratories, Inc. (Case No. 07-432-GMS) FINAL JOINT CLAIM CHART Claim Term "inhibiting" (Claims 16-20) Boehringer Ingelheim's Proposed Construction reducing compared to what would otherwise be but for the method employed Boehringer Ingelheim's Intrinsic Evidence '577 Patent, Col. 6:35-56; Figures 2-6; 7:35-50; 9:42-50 '577 Prosecution History Original Application 07/084,648 Application 08/421,351 Response to Office Action, dated February 15, 1996 Office Action of June 13, 1996 Response to Final Office Action, dated September 9, 1996 Office Action of March 23, 1999 Response to Office Action, dated March 29, 1999 Barr's Proposed Construction The term is indefinite Barr's Intrinsic Evidence Claims 16-20 '577 Patent, Figures 1-11; Col. 1:28-53; 2:30-52; 5:329:61; 9:63-13:17 '577 Prosecution History Original Application 07/084,648 Application 08/421,351 2-15-96 Response to Office Action 3-12-96 Response to Office Action 6-13-96 Office Action 9-9-96 Response to Office Action 11-5-96 Response to Office Action 11-12-98 Examiner Interview Summary 12-4-98 Response to Office Action 3-23-99 Office Action 3-29-99 Response to Office Action

-2-