Free Mail Returned - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

.1 . . f3
1 _0Q.0»»-» ,,;% 2006 Pa0¤1 ¤
( __,-0-,.w-».—~ 3 Fnled 07/ T 4/
Case 1 206-cv-00053-JJF Document 6 L
E 35 1
E. *= S 4
= Z fg {
2 ”'§ E ==— 2 1
. m P ¤s@§ 1
Q un Qi "’ 1
1 1 1* ge Q 51 E1 1
rn Q *'*
» §§§g¥ 1
2 E 1r· zz. <'¤ 1
R 1-— 2 2 ET 1
=» E2 g cu rr 1
·:» G e 1
°T° ne 1: 1
_ us ,__, Y1 1
Q °° 1
Q 1
1 1
${3% 1
Q YU E3 m sn f“ 1
O O \—4 1*-*1 $• !
H . $13 H 1
g U;] 1-* g _1
· rr O `J Q U) ‘ 1
O N 1"‘ 0 L. 1
1 z M S2 c: 101
. V ` O .*13 g O 1
" U O LQ 2 ITI 1
D1 I- $ E 1
- IU ha m 1
;-*· . O Q U :
sj; ® O G3
00 cu > wil g 1
in UWB l 3
E1 eééjg 1
éé izzge 1
#= gmggg 0 _ E
1 $,§§z=E _. 1- 1
r· ¤¤,¤¤g,. 5 ‘ _·». {
·• »_:_; mI'|'|'| g · , ~ 0 · _ 1
E; if s:~?i_Z,jg —\ *1*. @1 1
;•··‘ 3* va . »_ V
we; S22 1
2..- "* u.1 ’i - - .5 V
c Z: rg QE » ;_> V 1
E S 1`Z1 Q ga gg 1 i-; 11
= = S3 ¢¤w·> »w~1f 1
E $1 W tr. '<.'5‘,§‘_ Fi " 1
? " ‘—-J #· &° lJE1° ?*` 1
··-· .-1- -駧 ; 0 1
E"‘”‘ E I :’ i,. I ,
Z?. Z . I I ;r_Â¥, 5
in 3 , j ._.4 - .
gm g . . -_ .
° Y 1
ITI
I :
` _ _- 1

Ag Case 1 :06-cv-00053-JJF _ Document 63 Filed 07/14/2006 Page 2 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT .. - -1 I
E%‘i‘¥ii:r?Y` 61* Q
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE Z£}8§_,jU;,; 27 AHM?
JAMES A. WILSON, etal., )
)
Plaintiffs, ) _
-
v. ) Civ. N0. 06-53-KAJ .
) I
HELEN LOHMAN, SCOTT ) g " I
MORGAN, TOM CARVAN, JAY ) .
PLUMMER, and JOE FIELDS, )
I .
Defendants. ) I
ORDER
WHEREAS, the plaintiffs filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983
without prepayment of the filing fee;
WHEREAS, orders mailed to plaintiffs were returned as undeliverable to several
plaintiffs on the following dates as listedbelow: y 6
Nathaniel Bull March 9, 2006 D.l. 17
Lawrence Collohan February 27, 2006 DJ. 11
March 8,2006 D.i. 16
March 15, 2006 D.|. 23
March 24, 2006 D.I. 26
April 4, 2006 D.i. 36
May 19, 2006 `D.l..42
James Eley March 9, 2006 D-I. 18
Charles Hitchens May 19, 2006 D.|. 41
V\Hlliam H. Holloman, Jr. March 9, 2006 D.I. 20
Lawrence King _ March 15, 2006 D.l. 22 ‘ I
` ` ‘ March 24, 2006 D.l. 28
_e - l _ _ ._ __ April 4, 2_006 D.I.35
I May 19, 2006 ‘ ·D.|. 40 A - ._ I

_z- Case 1 :06-cv-00053-JJF Document 63 Filed 07/14/2006 Page 3 of 3
Samuel NlcGlatt0n I\/larch 24, 2006 D.l. 27 ,
April 4, 2006 D.l. 34 _
May 19, 2006 D.l. 39 ;
Robert Scott February 27, 2006 D.l. 10
I\/larch 9, 2006 D.l. 19
|\/Iarch 15, 2006 D.l. 21 I
March 24, 2006 D.l. 29
April 4, 2006 D.l. 33 _
l
WHEREAS, the above listed plaintiffs apparently have either been released from
custody or transferred to a different institution, and have failed to inform the court of ·
their new addresses; _ ·i
WHEREAS, other plaintiffs have filed pleadings in this case, but the above listed
plaintiffs have taken no action in this matter for a period of at least three months;
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that, on or before July 27, 2006, the above
listed plaintiffs shall show cause why they should not be dismissed from the case for
failure to inform the court of their current address and for failure to take any action in
the case. `
_ unmao stm; ict JUDG
DATED:
2