Free Order on Motion to Withdraw as Attorney - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

_ s Case 3:00-cv-00894;,JCH Document 28 Filed 11/12/2003 Pa e 1 of 1 _
O O ¤ 0 IIN? *I we
C II··
/
‘° anus 0 ·
5 CI — b A Cl- ll 2
~·.
3 USI;I§i_31.i{r I.
B. _ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
( FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
. I
- BAY VIEW COMMERCIAL LEASING, INC. : CIVIL ACTION NO I
Plaintiff, 3:00 CV 894 (J CH)
I VS- 1 I
“ P RICK GLENN, MICHAEL GLENN AND
RONALD R. SCHUELER :
\§\ Defendants.
{ : OCTOBER 3, 2003 I
S g Q MOTION T0 WITHDRAW APPEARANCE
W Attorney David M. Bizar of Day, Berry & Howard, LLP ("Day, Berry”), hereby moves
Q pursuant to D. Conn. L. Civ. R. 7(e) to withdraw his appearance for defendant Ronald R. Schueler
® S (“Schueler") in the above—captioned matter.
I
Q § ‘ The reasons for the requested withdrawal of appearance are that: (l) Schueler has failed to
t
.. Q sign and return the two engagement letters sent to him by Day, Berry; (2) Schueler has failed and I
Q refusedwto pay the legal fees for services provided by Day, Berry and expenses incurred by Day, I
%·f‘>`c:» I I
\ _ ` \E(Berry?%iQEom1ection with this matter; (3) Schueler has not responded to recent efforts to
\ A
QQ. ‘ with him and, therefore, there has been a breakdown of communication between
* `FIZIH I
*.1; — ex at@1eyaii8§§slient; and (4) Day, Berry has advised Schueler and his Chicago counsel that it would
•‘hII·‘* $3 ({:3
Q " Kqfo withdraw if the issues described above-were not resolved and Schueler has not responded
rs
·- y dressed any of these issues. ·
Q g "¤ I
xi é I
g EQ L ARGUMENT REQUESTED I
q I
I
J--ii ;- 3 _;_ ;- L lf} if :_?i?T;::;;iE;?;=?éj`jj-iff:T i 1 #_ .f ,_ _f _ _i_i
yi; if I 7:7 ; ; Lra Q {;r<§;_1;;T5:T;;=T;;;;jT:ii:f?i v 1 -, r_ .f ,_ _ _ __ i