Free Memorandum in Opposition to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

Case 3:00-cv—O1115—PCD Document 86-10 Filed O2/14/2006 Page 1 014
EXHIBIT I

·»—- - - · - -·TO"·r · · —·
r€ase#3r00"cv·0*I" _ QE 2`° I
Case 2:90~cv~OO626—PCD Document 175 Filed 08/10/2005 » I
2~ , t. I · · · · wr
MAN DATE
97 Civ. 2601 I
Dors . >
I’*II...EI9 =
United States Court of Appeals I
· mn ms .
p SECOND CIRCUIT ZUU5 AUG I il P I 35
At a stated Term of the United"Sta& Court of Appeals ICIIIIRJ I
Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, o ey quaie, 3
in the City of New York, on the llth Day of July, Two thousand and five, I
A I
Present: I
_, * Hon. John M. Walker, Jr., °"' " ` ,
Chief Judge, ,_ I _ l
Hon. Dennis Jacobs, *~ `
Hon. José A. Cabranes, g g 1 1 /MS
Circuit Judges. ` =:,__ s I I t.-
` W; _ _-_ .'»i * ' ·v J; Z,,.,,l.2`~"•"
I Suzanne M. Searles, `
Plaintiff—Appellant, I
4 v. 05-1226-cv I
‘ I West Hartford Board of Education,
: Def`endant»Appellee. I
Appellant, pro se, appeals the district court's denial of her motion for relief under Federal Rule of E
‘ Civil Procedure 60(b) and to change venue. Upon due consideration, it is ORDERED that the appeal ’
1 is dismissed because it lacks an arguable basis in fact or law. See 28 U.S.C. § l9l5(e);Ne1'rzke v.
— = Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989).
i In addition, Appellant is reminded that, by order entered in Searles v. Relic, No. O4~O55l, on April E
7, 2005, Appellant is prohibited from filing any further motions, appeals, or other papers in this
Court "with respect to the facts, claims, or issues underlying the [appeal docketed under 04-0551] g
or the prior appeals docketed under 92-7912, 98-~9l33, and 01—7007" without first obtaining leave _
of this Court. I
I I
FOR THE COURT:
{ A TRUE COPY Roseann MacKechnie lerk I
Roseann B. MacKechnie, CLERK — I
I

DEPUTY CLERK I
_ _ www I- MG ,5 2005
ISSUED AS MAMDATE "
I. . ..·· I §
I
I
_ _ _ _ _ 1;;
‘¢ >*"= ";*€°;=¤;*·¤~`WAH¤`iaés=»¤..2%·g:y·mmsgsgggsgrz5a,;;.;,si4;;·,i·-giemit;Jr.,_,;2·;e—;,z··;z_.·i.,,a; ..,. · ¤.a:¤.,..
I III_ I M _4_I
‘ ‘··*——=·~~·-—=-·~·~~~··—·--—~· —
. _ _ I `“"""‘ " ‘ ‘ ""‘"“·’*···*···~·¤ ·¤ ~¤‘-·=»=v-~¤e¤w..#a,Eusr*·Tx7Es%£·;£4,=s,as,:.n,,..,l.me
I ....
I Ippé I v_



Gasefit cumen — 1 9 a G 0
_ ,__ Case 3:00~cv-01115—PCD Document 81 Filed 08/19/2005 Pa e 1 ow S,,,,e,__ (—
Cj *m , D. Conn. ""’ ` A I
1 ’ O0 Civ. 1115 5
D D0rsey, J, I up A
N\dAN 1~ 11.. lll 1
Unite States Court of Appeals 1
FOR THE , _ ’
At a stated Term of the United States Court of Appeals]f§r,lElie,l‘§ii§¢opkl1ZURT
Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse; Foley Sqtiarb,
in the City of New York, on the llth Day of July, Two thousand and five,
Present: _Vh_ _
Hon. John M. Walker, Jr., /
` ‘ Chief Judge, icfyré 1t:E 0 s
Hon. Dennis Jacobs, dm 1 1 2005 1u»1
Z3 ·· QW Y
Hon. José A. Cabranes, l` {gay ’
Circuit Judges. ig
... “·&_;§f1lD(·~j¥
1 Suzanne M. Searles, _
I Plaintiff»Appellant,
i V. 05-1211-cv
1 Board of Education, West Hartford, Paul Berkel, Nancy
I Schulman, Matthew Borrelli, Peter Relic, Lloyd Calvert,
Q James J. Moore, James J. Fredericks, M.D., James Black,
M. Peter Blum, Neil Macy, William Dolan,
Defendants—Appellees.
1 Appellant, pro se, appeals the district court's denial of her motion for relief under Federal Rule of
Civil Procedure 60(b) and to change venue. Upon due consideration, it is ORDERED that the appeal
§ is dismissed because it lacks an arguable basis in fact or law. See 28 U.S.C. l915(e); Neitzke v.
1 Williams, 490 U.S. 3l9, 325 (1989).
1 In addition, Appellant is reminded that, by order entered in Searles v. Relic, No. 04-0551, on April
° 7, 2005, Appellant is prohibited from filing any further motions, appeals, or other papers in this
1 Court "with respect to the facts, claims, or issues underlying the [appeal docketed under O4-0551]
1 or the prior appeals docketed under 92-7912, 98~9]33, and 01~7007" without first obtaining leave
1 or this com
1
1 FOR THE COURT:
A TRUE COPY Roseann MacKechnie, `lerk
1 Reseami B. Macxechnie, CLERK r
E { QAAJ _
! by
DEPUTY
l I— I
I saoiow - ' , I 7 ·-
l l$$U€d Qs; rvwt ‘" " ‘·‘’ r ’ ‘ ‘ r · = — =
. ·~·— - · » ;;;.[.ffjf"’ —~-— - » - - - - .
--~·-- Q' "<·`·‘¢=.=·-==-==-==,»=_-F-~.;,.,,.,,f,.;._.‘1 Q
,.=,,,¤,,,,., ```‘ “ ‘‘“" · · — -°

» ; · ·- ;»%44 ?TZ7"i‘f ‘ Ti
¢=··--·--------—-----.....· · · -.._. . `""`
`”i““`C°’

“‘"eCas·e*3To0¢ev¤0TtT5 * ·4~of ,
Case 3:00-cv—01115—PCD Document 80 Filed 08/10/2005 Page 1 of 1 I
2- , t. - · · as
MANDATE ¤·
97 Civ. 2601 I
DOTS . ¤¤¤ ‘
ttIln...t-sro I
. United States Court of Appeals l
POR THE .
SECOND CIRCUIT ZUU5 AUG I U P I- 35
At a stated Term of the United States Court of Appeals QCQQRT r
Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, o ey quafe, ;
in the City of New York, on the 11th Day of July, Two thousand and five, I
z
I
Present: `
2 Hon. John M. Walker, Jr., °"" ”‘ " ,
cmafmdge, » _ '
Hon. Dennis Jacobs, *~ ` ‘·
i Hon. José A. Cabranes, g g 11 [MS
Circuit Judges.
Suzanne M. Searles, '
Plaintiff~Appellant,
·I v. 05-1226-cv I
‘ p West Hartford Board of Education,
c Defendant--Appellee. I
Appellant, pro se, appeals the district court's denial of her motion for relief under Federal Rule of i
1 Civil Procedure 60(b) and to change venue. Upon due consideration, it is ORDERED that the appeal ’
1 is dismissed because it lacks an arguable basis in fact orlaw. See 28 U.S.C. § l9l5(e); Neizzke v.
» - Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989).
' In addition, Appellant is reminded that, by order entered in Searles v. Relic, No. 04~0551, on April l
7, 2005, Appellant is prohibited from filing any further motions, appeals, or other papers in this
Court "with respect to the facts, claims, or issues underlying the [appeal docketed under 04-0551] ;
or the prior appeals docketed under 92-7912, 98—~9l33, and 0l—7007" without first obtaining leave p
of this Court.
I
FOR THE COURT:
i A TRUE COPY Roseann MacKechnie lerk 5
Rosearm B. MacKeohn5.e, CLERK — {
_.._".. I

DEPUTY CLERK M
_f ’ p I
. li {
Y l ·- saovow _ *5
ISSUED AS MANDATE "
I
I
· “" ‘
— - l·"· .—-—-:..:·.:_:..:__;_,_,_;, M - _; - r _ 4_ _.-v_ ,_ » ~··»-~--.,.a..-.-_.-_.. _ - H E
`L >*°‘= i?‘3*%£’1.*‘E*2;=i*·`*”WéxkaEwaR.b34;:;‘·$a§a1Q£&g&rt§@,g¢p,.;;·;»s,i‘·piinuse ;iS;,,;2.—.¤ ,:~;,i;.·»,>.·;;;,¤;:. im.; ir,. .··,
M _,_,
p _ p
i 3% yi*2*Etu==;“·‘···`=*éw:~¤QQ=»é:.2§£xg·mritz&g;g;;;,t;;sm,;a$sk.2.;;i’sr:~.¤»,,;;;.,:24are >¢:,.,:.,s ..-...