Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

_ - ;-
Case 3.00-cv-00610-EBB Document .101 Filed 12/03/2003 Page 1 of 1 1
· ° I 1
A _ S- 1
.11-_ fr 1"1 L E D
,1;} *:1;;- §.T,'_ ;-Mr
up J, __ W ` " ` **1 lid
j UNITED STATES DISTRICT couar
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
MAX KAPLAN
leiiigéég Plaintiff '_
‘ vs. T
CASE NUMBER 300C\/00610 (EBB) Q YW!
1 MYRNA LEHRER,
gf-.f&j.f, Defendant/Third Party
1 Plaintiff 1
. 1 y vs_ 1. 1
RITA LITVACK NOVEMBER 21, 2003
\_y\\
l ` ~ Third Party Defendant
MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME
S The defendant/third-party plaintiff, Myrna Lehrer, moves for an enlargement of time of
- -1 -
ten days - to December 11, 2003 - to respond to Rita Litvack’s November 13, 2003 Objection to
Recommended Ruling on Defendants Motion for Reconsideration (“Objection"). Ms. Lehrer’s 1
1 ‘=\_
. . +1 1
-.-A "`— counsel did not receive the November 13, 2003 objection until November 18, 2003. Presently, a 1
Qisj reply would be due on December 1, 2003. Ms. Lehrer requires additional time to research new
l ni legal argunrfgntsandfor facts presented in the objection. The time to prepare a reply presently
L. 1... 1 1 1 1
, ` 1 jeg ~ 2 _ = I-if
1.,3,,,, U,) L. 1
11::
7135
;_,___; ~J 1
I
I 1 I 1
·._' I 1
I 1