Free Order on Motion for Protective Order - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

I I
I .,5 ‘ [ Case 3:00-cv-00835-CFD Document 350 Filed O3/31/2OO¢O6P§g%%I'R;II‘$i"I1°’VI Im I
I I ’ I
. rg I
I I UNITED STATES DISTRICT cousr mi GI? I za ,4, I I, I I
Ig DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT , 8
Q III] c> ·I~I;II .. _ I
*¤ ;* ,0 €__·I.f, T ”‘ ;;I—- :
E e I II-URULIIIIIII I
I-= I
Ii I
E INDYMAC BANK, F.S.B. I
§ CIVIL ACTION I
'° Plaintiff NO. 3:00CV835 (CFD) I
E I
¤
.9, I
JJ V.
E I
SI MOSTAFA REYAD AND WAFA REYAD I
S Defendants DATE: OCTOQI ER 28, 2003
E
JJ
E DEFENDANTS’ PETITION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER, AGAINST I
'S - PLAINTIFF’S DISCOVERY REQ QUEST I
S I
(|) I
M I
§ Defendants hereby respectfully file their petition for Protective Order to preclude
N
R Plaintiffs depositions. Defendants received on October 27, 2003 Notice of Deposition to
·¤
u
E be conducted on November 5, 2003, [attached hereto],. On December 3, 2002, this Court
E Ordered Re: Status Report (Court Order Number 272). The Order made it clear that if any I
In
rg party wishes to modify the Scheduling Order, should file a separate motion. The parties
II']
In jointly tiled the Joint Status Report on December 23, 2002 (Doc # 273), and neither party I
¤ I
3 filed a motion to modify the “Scheduling Order". However, Plaintiff made certain
0.} I
I-CI 1 1
: 0 reservation to take deposition of Defendants, and pulled back their reservation, g, page
O U! 1
·e
§] lg _ IQQIYIMHC intends to pursue these discovery issues, Indyl\/[ac does not want such I
-.-I I_,_,aI_,_IT IE I In L,-_P een- : . an n
3 l?‘§‘ “`issue*s todelay titiai and is prepared to proceed to trial even if such issues have not been I
-I-I
IB ?’ , I
Gi. · -- I·gQIvg&’_i.iIIII IIIIIIZ
s III I
H JJ .- mv;} I
da IIIII I I I
I I Iii I I
E I EM
In u I3 IR I
I
1 I