Free Order on Motion to Withdraw - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

1 ' __ G . Case 3:00-cv-OOSBTCYD Document 349 Filed O3/@$004 Page 1 of 1
1 ~ .
1 1
5 Of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
1 DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT i
1 —....m_1.,.m_ a 1» =
1 INDYMAC MORTGAGE HOLDINGS, INC. :1; _. . 1
1 Plaintiff CIVIL ACTION r'} if it ‘ 1. ’
1 NO. 3:0OCV835 _) `~ =.i1. 1
` l
V. ,;,34 ~*
1 1
1 MOSTAFA REYAD and WAFA REYAD
1 Y Defendants DATE: SEPTEMBER 9, 2003
1 >\———“_r—*——1 1
\é Q
~.
Q g` DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO WITHDRAW
¤ 1. MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC # 263) 1
2. MOTION REQUESTING DENIAL FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (DOC # 284) 1
_ { R 3. PORTION OF MOTION TO STRIKE (DOC # 291) 1
° 1
~ 1
3 : 1
Defendants hereby respectfully request to withdraw: I
N` .
s <= · 1
y 1
°°3\ _ I.\;;“_D€fGHd3HI’S motion to dismiss upon provided evidence that the lending agreement 1
2 V LI · .
{ I C} ZA1;.2;~__':) _ `
§ \ Q- `is> sa.\111ega1 contract, dated in its caption September 10, 2002, entered on October
D1 "Q 1*}
A\ T" _ __ 15*,*.2002 (Doc # 263). Defendant’s withdrawal is due to the fact, that, the contents
A (ry. .
of thatmotion, were included thereafter in the Amended Summary Judgment filed
- Rx in i..;1F¤\
hy Sen April 3, 2003 (Doc # 280); Pursuant to this Court endorsement Order dated 1
1
1
» March 31, 2003.

I 1
......;._--.LLm1