Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

Case 3:00-cv-00835&(%FD Document 333 Filed O2/1172004 P@(jy@?;{m¤1¤·!' I
\ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT I? .-I Vlek " { '”II
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT I * -‘`·
rl; IW
_ {U -. l
Z ‘~ zi ;__,`° ‘ I I`
INDYMAC BANK, F.S.B., : IVIL ACTION NO. l
I Plaintiff. : 3:00CV835(CFD)
rw ;· :
liv I *`·—’ 1 *
IIIIOSTAFA REXAD and WAFA REYAD, : FEBRUARY 9, 2004 I
. ,> A Defendants. I
g - Q MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
as 8.
C3 _¤ I
Q gis: Plaintiff lndyMac Bank, F.S.B. hereby requests a twenty-one (21) day extension
Q3
liiifi. {time, through March 1, 2004, in which to file its opposition to Defendants’ Motion to I
ml r
®ismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), dated January 14, 2004. Plaintiffs opposition to I
liv c§??¤•°°d`
gaid Motion currently is due on February 9, 2004. The requested extension of time is
{Eiga ` ,.1r.I
QJ - I IO Mecessary due to the fact that the undersigned counsel has been on trial in the matter
Message Center Management vs. David Getchell, etal, Case No. X07—CV-00-
i
00737388, before the Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of Tolland at
Rockville, Complex Litigation Docket, since February 3, 2004, and the trial is estimated
to last the remainder of this week. In addition, the undersigned is scheduled to begin
another trial in the matter Errol Dunkley v. Luis Duarte, Case No. 3:98 CV 1035 (PCD),
before the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, next Tuesday,
February 17, 2004, which trial is expected to conclude on February 20, 2004. Plaintiff
respectfully requests that it be permitted the requested additional time so that
aumz I
I
l