Free Motion to Dismiss - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

Weiss"- ·.....»—· . - ·.- .
N E Case 3:00-cv-00835-CFD Document 325 Filed O1/14/2004 Page 1 of 3 N
i UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
ji DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
I
INDYMAC BANK, F.S.B. N
. Plaintiff CIVIL ACTIOQIQIIIO. I
3:00CV835
rf
c’>;Er}>_ J?
T" CTI`. l'\
( MOSTAFA IREYAD AND WAFA REYAD (F N
Defendants N
DATE: JANUARY 14, 2004
DEFEIj|DANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO RULE 12 (b) (6)
I
3 Defendants hereby respectfully move this Court to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Entire
Complain, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 12 (b) (6). Plaintiffs cause of action is I
barred by the doctrine of res judicata. The parties filed the Joint Trial
Memorandum on November 18, 2003. The Court Ordered, as of January 9, 2004
this case is Iready for Trial. Rule 12 (b) (6) is a defense of failure to state a claim
upon which relief can be granted, and Rule 12 (h) (2) stipulates "A defense of N
failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted ..... may be made .... N
. by motion forjudgment on the pleadings, or at the trial on the merits.
Defendants filed on December 3, 2003 motions to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12
(b) (6) founded on Plaintiff lacks capacity to sue, and did not include the issue of
I
res judicata which is applicable by the same Rule. It is on or about January 5,
2004; The [District of Connecticut published, Kevin Hackett v. Eileen Storey, etal,
N I

· i
! · l Case 3:00-cv-00835-CFD Document 325 Filed O1/14/2004 Page 2 of 3
l i
i i case number 3:03 CV 395 (Hon. Janet Bond Arterton, U.S.D.J. Decision dated
i December 30, 2003); gg, Defendant exhibit # 1 to transcript of this Court
N hearing dated January 9, 2004. Also it is on or about January 7, 2004, the District i
) of Connecticut published, Media Group, Inc. etal v. Raymond Toppatsch, case
i number 3:02 CV 1814 (Hon. Mark R. Kravitz, U.S.D.J. Decision dated December
i 31, 2003); gg, Defendant exhibit # 2 to transcript of this Court hearing dated i
Q January 9, 2004.
i
On the same ground of the legal standard, applied in the above two recent
decisions of this District. This Honorable Court should Grant this motion pursuant
to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 12 (b) (6) and Dismiss Plaintiff’s Entire Complaint as a
matter of law.
`
\ ‘
i
i
l l
` E
i
i

i


2
·——·—,, l :—;*"ll‘"‘"‘"""‘“""""””’““““”"”“’“““"'““'““'””“”"””"'""'

J
J
· ‘ ' Case 3:00-cv-00835-CFD Document 325 Filed 01/14/2004 Page 3 of 3
J
J J
The Defendant The Defendant J
Mostafa Rteyad Wafa Reyad
J - J
J By: By: Mg gg I 2;
` `
Mostafa Rteyad Wafa Reyad
2077 Center Ave # 22D 2077 Center Ave # 22D
J Fen Lee, NJ 07024 Fm Lee, NJ 07024 J
Day Phone 203-325-4100 Home Phone 201-585-0562 J
J Home Phone 201-585-0562 J
J I
J J
J J
J
J
J CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
J J
The undersigned certifies that he mailed on the captioned date a tme and correct copy to
J
Attorney David Schafer at 271 Whitney Ave, New Haven, CT 06511.
J
J
g/252; ég
J
Mestafa eya
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J J
J
J
J J
J J ‘ J
JJ