Free Order on Motion for Conference - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

i A TTFT ___mm“_—__—"-—___;— -—;—*__—””-"““i-_w`——__FI
I _ ...... 3:00-cv—OO339-RNC Document 128 Filed O3/O2/2006 Page 1 of 1 I
,,,
`
o
LM Hlth FEB 28 A ii= 12 N
4:
° , ~.·;-N a"-{QP F
5 urxurso smrss oisraicr count TT Y if C
Qi DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT /¤‘
gg I
·§ THOMAS O'CONNOR, Z NO.: 3200CV339 (RNC) N
§‘ v. ` I
S Z E
(D LYNNE B. PIERSON, ET AL 2 February 27, 2006
4,; E
M ?
*5 DEFENDANT’S REQUEST FOR A PREFILING CONFERENCE N
Ut n
Q {I U; Pursuant to Judge Chatigny’s Chamber‘s Practices, the defendants hereby N
r- T request that the Court conduct a pre-filing conference with regard tothe defendants’ I
U * :>. ‘
EI. , E] Motion for Summary Judgment. The defendants argue in said Motion that Mr.
cu , . 4.J _1
LE I- gi O’Connor’s case should be dismissed on the grounds of res judicata. N
,§ 2 . Wi-IIEREFORE, the defendants respectfully request that this Court accordingly _
I-I I 4.} ·_j_` I; . I I
E \ , ${;;·Isch<%EiIuIe'_ai_pre-filing conference. N
w "` i
"`I ‘ Q: ""”":, VF 1.. Q. I I
3 E-E ‘ l N
'U GJ -
U #4 · 2.
GJ
cv rcs gag,
.c: I-r
E—• o
. {,9, _ i
to
22 . i
r: ua i
ru 0 N
L') ID i
. M
03 I
s LH I
no r: I
0 o . I
0 0 I
or
0*
·· rz:
N -.—• ·
.—i
zz -.-r
0 M-i .
H cu N
E és;