Free Probation Form 12 - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

Fm ,2 Case 3:00-cr-00186-RNC Document 371 Filed O4/25/2008 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
U.S.A. vs. TROY MOODY Docket No. 3?0Qf(§R00tl§{§(I{1NC)
° Q or s,
PETITION ON PROBATION AND SUPERVISED
{ ‘ fa D
·.. 3:
COMES NOW STEVEN J. LAMBERT, PROBATION OFFICER OF THE COURT, presedflng an
official report upon the conduct and attitude of Troy Moody who was sentenced to 60 imprisonment
on Count One and 68 months’ imprisonment concurrent on Count Six for a violation of 18 u.s;c;;~seét1tm 371,
Conspiracy to Commit Bank Fraud and 18 U.S.C. Section 1344 (a), Bank Fraud by the Honorable Robert N.
Chatigny, Chief United States District Judge sitting in the court at Hartford, Connecticut on June 1, 2004 who
fixed the period of supervision at 3 years on Count One and 5 years on Count Six to run concurrently which
commenced on July 2, 2007 and imposed the general terms and conditions theretofore adopted bythe court and
also imposed special conditions and terms as follows: 1) The defendant will pay restitution in the amount of
$436,361 with interest waived. Restitution payments will be made at the rate of 20% ofthe defendant’s gross
income, but no less than EB 100 per month; SEE PAGE 2
RESPECTFULLY PRESENTIN G PETITION FOR ACTION OF COURT AND FOR CAUSE AS
FOLLOWS:
The defendant is being cited for violating the following conditions of supervised release:
Charge N0.1:Standard Condition No. 4: "You shall answer truthfully all inquiries by the probation officer and
follow the inst_ructions of the probation officer."
On March 3, 2008, Troy Moody was instructed to report to the probation office on a bi-weekly basis,
specifically, every Monday until otherwise directed due to his failure to obtain legitimate employment. He has
subsequently failed to report on March 17, 2008, March 31, 2008 and April 14, 2008. Additionally, Mr. Moody
has failed to respond to written correspondence instructing him to contact the probation office and several
telephone messages left at his residence. During several home visits to Mr. Moody’s residence, he has not been
home nor has he, to date, responded to business cards left at his residence instructing him to contact the
probation office.
PRAYING THAT THE COURT WILL ORDER a warrant to issue tolling Mr. Moocly’s term of
supervised release. _ ,
ORDER OF COURT Sworn to By / \ Q
A 4 8
Considered and ordered this day of April, (T ;.
2008 and ordered filed and made a part of the Steven J. Lambert dg mz
records in the above case. /. Senior United States Probation O -ici ' Q a
i , ¤:;i
N. . Place ' I I ·
Chief United States District Judge Date LlL“ 'LJ/’ 0 X :1
Before me, the Honorable Robert N. Chatigny, Chief United States District Judge, on this Zgry of April,
2008 at Hartford, Connecticut, Senior U.S. Probation Officer Steven J. Lambert appeared and under oath stated
that the facts set forth in this petition are true to the best of his knowledge and pelief. (
W ·?¤¤sIt it cnaamv, useef
rue rrorroraore Robert N.0Chatigny

Case 3:00-cr-00186-RNC Document 371 Filed O4/25/2008 Page 2 of 2
Chief United States District Judge
SPECIAL CONDITIONS (CONTINUED)
(2) The defendant will participate in a program of substance abuse monitoring, counseling, and treatment as
directed by the United States Probation Office; and (3) the defendant will participate in a program of mental
health evaluation, counseling, and treatment under the direction of the United States Probation Office; the
defendant wil pay all, or a portion of, the costs associated with his participation in these programs based on his
ability to pay, in an amount to be determined by the United States Probation Office.