Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 48.7 kB
Pages: 1
Date: February 7, 2006
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 255 Words, 1,618 Characters
Page Size: 610.08 x 804.72 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/22985/88.pdf

Download Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut ( 48.7 kB)


Preview Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut
·=#-» \`· Case 3:03-cv-O1055(·C Document 88 Filed O2/06/@6 Page 1 of 1 ’
Ziiiib FEB -8 A ii= 20 A
uwmao sTATEs orsmrct couRT li J A »
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
DOLORES FONSECA, ET AL :V *\/ V
I = Ai I
Plaintiffs, : CIV. tw 3:03CV1055 (AVC).
VS. I
. JASON ALTERIO, ET AL ‘ _
Defendants . FEBRUARY 3, 2006
J MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND ‘
TO PLA|NTlFFS’ REPLY TO SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Pursuant to Local Rule 7(b)(2), the Defendants requestan extension of time
1 -, to reply to the Plaintiffs’ Response to Summary Judgment dated January 13, 2006.
I Ti
F} Counsel for the Defendants requests this extension because she has had an
_ U1
E unexpected death in the immediate family. ·?
> ` It
I Q E ln accordance with Rule 7(b)(3), counsel for the Plaintiff and co-Defendant
_ G)
C5 Q ‘ ,§ were contacted to determine their position. Attorney Polan has indicated there is no
Q Q V; V objectionggjand Attorney Spector, counsel for co-Defendant, was not available and a
· M & in 'LAJ \\ M
U ' meéisagejyvas left. He has not contacted counsel regarding his position.
· KW V? ‘ _Q ___4_ V .'.v, M
*° " ' The Defendants request an extension until February 9, 2006.
gg c H OQ r » J
Oi, _ . This is the Defendants’ second request for an extension toyreply, I V _
wg 'Q 5 y »
Z>~r¤¤ A , J .
$4 ul M . . = " , ·`rr » , it
ru Q A . · I I I · t A ‘
D uf. . A J · , ,
$4 O ` ‘ `
_Q ,
0) O A
Eu U]
BMFOGO13 V _* 1