Free Reply to Response to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 128.6 kB
Pages: 3
Date: October 7, 2004
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 683 Words, 4,128 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/22874/37.pdf

Download Reply to Response to Motion - District Court of Connecticut ( 128.6 kB)


Preview Reply to Response to Motion - District Court of Connecticut
I ”——“*M—— I1
I I , Case 3:03- v- O9] -RNC cument 37 IfiIed10/O4/2004 Page1 0f3
I Uh IéIcd §QI0IcS DI$`Ir`1c;`I
I COUPT
· ·— ·» , I;
I DIS I I"IC`I— Op CO¤¤@CIlQu—I`
I ZHUUUCT—La ;:> gm
I I ~ G . Iiciiz.iT.IF?IY.’i’[€?,? =2E¤?%Ti’ I
I do WGS m€I \/Sk _
v»/O¤¤€ cgamg ,- em S“I’I€mI°’“`·’“? °2""" ` I
pcamclcz Shaq
€¤r`=p_l 5cm,;¤I< Ig
pqu mc: I—IUSI:>cmd
TI_nTc1 Donovan
JIVY7 IQ IOP 2
IJIMII
·... • . _ I

OQFOSCS TO DGITGOOIOYIIS OQQOSITIEDVI
IgO—I—€CI SEQTCTUIQJGF °@200“I,TO QIC1\°Y`I—I_{I?p mOT¢bn I
Of` Su VYwY1CM`gj _l_)*¤F»\cI%rv1c¤T,_I-QGSQGQTFUII — I
LJU|I_I’) TIWQ QIIOIITI I`? UQQOFI pOI` DQPGOSICJIUTS
gg? I‘lO\V§i{;,gO dm? Exgginsxcm <>VTnm<: T0 I‘Iri$wcP I
WSa*TwTI TTI0 gm cg? Swrnmcxftj Jucjgmeri
VY\€¥`•C1Y`CAI'\ Umc Lcwu In BU Ori Unc] I`
Rue 56, Ped \?.<;.Q pp QI
pIQ\°HT1'F`I:`\—IGmc$ I'Y1¤~r~`\' wiTI».
PCSQECTTO C0nT€¤CI There is my genuine (Sauce T0 be Tried QS I
$0 CIYWQTYYIQTEVIQI I—`¤CTcmcI Thcff The m ]]“Icc.I 0c¤_)ucImcnT,·· mmj be rcndeved can c issue mi?
IIYDIDI I CxIOY\€.j "‘ I?e.$p<—2·;TP¤\I»j‘t
P10 l·Y'\TI`P I}; _ I
II
vv1.€S I-€€ WI!-`-K\YlY10r( mge

n I. p¤8a@%~3$"i’“&%a?8F4”vR¥Ji f%?&"'£?'$*5€w J£$i’¤"%°§€2°€ JE? 2CTi`°w».
. H C
cava crm wel gwdemg Op ,·~,
y d 7. p` CI Thi? PCLCTS YTOLMQUQD
T\f1€ §.Ouf;I-S I"0l€ under Ruifl {JQ- T2 C..Qmqpr~OLU[;j %
WYMTSFI I0 ?tS5€S5'|t’\9 The Tlnrcslmlel issue q,i?4,U +·.€T1»,€ p
1 gqgpunnehrisgge @><:é,:F To m¤T@Y`iql pc;4qTg7 @lc.JmTc(?P
f_n¤§¤£¤§Upc iid`; www &T> , por .
i §i?€?Fs;&’l{““ Q
“

—
plcxj NWFP; pmvscrwczrs Inoue 0 C;0ngTiTUT•E>nc»| r~fghT To
PW Wig In T}'1€iY` medical cI¤`<1qn¤s,es cmd cme? media
CQ? {Y1 P;>r~mc¤jT¢bn · pleclscsgel- Q ,,L \/, gl C
©L% QQ R Sd Crim °¢<2<>0¤nq cw n¤:¤¤: UDTj W
QFLL; .Y7Q· p$Q$>P·`7I$ 72q(\/\/.D.N.Y \Cl |)\A!¤Od$ ?
\/·.\M."•.!I€,é8Q FY Swpp XM $75 -7Cp w.D.wf§°E§/j
Gwjsgd SMC: Pic! WOM Cm lCi€rO)\pg&»V.gg;$!9bi]'g GCN f
V. opp- Illgpjl |Sl37·38(|'LD.!\I. .. IQSSP [jgg Vumgqm
g\nUm·1QCp .Q,D..#|?>7.Li`5CI(D Ccmn, @$*85 ` R
HBO Qkiusc $66; [Q_<> 799 €`.Sgpp.=_B7(p 58,2-85 D.?] W). Cl O J$cI©$uPe:
@6; medic?} ¤Y\P©r*m<¤T1bn c»b0uT CL Dlf`iSODC·I` mug n
CA 0 x/nb 0 c STOKE Law. {
4
Qespec pu Nj 1 I
_ lOx'1nT*.?p‘j _

] In ’ Case 3:03-cv—OO944—RNC Document 37 Fi|ed10/O4/2004 Page30f3
W
I h€f`€;bj C€f"I—ip YY`\OkH€C] T0 The c’;|<:R=;n<;i<>m`Y$ F\TT©Pr1cj 0(2 recom)
Th\$ 2 S, DC.l\j O p 5€QT€V`|’\b€$`l 200%, QSO I
TWWQT TM5 CIOJm T0 be True; cmd T0 W6
*0esT OP rwmj cb} \i`Txj,
N
D€¥ETlC1QF\TS Imclfviciuctl Cc1pQ<.`1Tc3,
Yvcrwm Cc>lcTTe;· QTQL
€Qm@{C4 Shaq
cr Sc '
Q9¤\p"“‘€ MU Skggnnil Fgeigégr-EJl[j` *
YUTQ Don qv Cl n
»\\VY\ TQ lov @$~2“`.;£E§T~r¢Zw1’2,'A§V '°"°$°
camo 5
\ HS$ns`l`cwiT FiT\`<>rnc,~j%cnercL\ i
C6-‘d€Y`¤| Bar no, ;T;es;,1q7
\\O,$V1€.Fvvn<1m $Tn*<=;€\_
\-\c:mT {—Y>r~c\ C0nn·2<;—lTlzuT
OGIOS
E
_}