Free Affidavit - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 38.5 kB
Pages: 2
Date: February 2, 2004
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 364 Words, 2,458 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/22713/66.pdf

Download Affidavit - District Court of Connecticut ( 38.5 kB)


Preview Affidavit - District Court of Connecticut
Case 3:03-cv-00596-JBA

Document 66

Filed 02/02/2004

Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT TOM JAMES COMPANY, Plaintiff, V. TRACE APPAREL LLC and J. TRACY GREEN, Defendants. : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 303 CV 0596 (JBA)

FEBRUARY 2, 2004

AFFIDAVIT OF PAULA CRUZ CEDILLO IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN REPLY TO DEFENDANTS' MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO COMPEL ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY

I, Paula Cruz Cedillo, do hereby swear and affirm under the penalty of perjury as follows: 1. I am an attorney with the law firm of Halloran & Sage LLP, attorneys for the

plaintiff, Tom James Company ("Tom James"), in the above-captioned matter. I make this affidavit in connection with Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law in Reply to Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Motion to Compel Electronic Discovery, dated February 2, 2004 ("Motion"). 2. Counsel for the parties participated in numerous telephone conferences

regarding Defendants' incomplete production in response to Tom James' discovery requests, in order to attempt to obtain additional production from Defendants.

One Goodwin Square 225 Asylum Street Hartford, CT 06103

HALLORAN & SAGE LLP

Phone (860) 522-6103 Fax (860) 548-0006 Juris No. 26105

Case 3:03-cv-00596-JBA

Document 66

Filed 02/02/2004

Page 2 of 2

3.

In one such telephone conference regarding Defendants' production of

documents, Defendants' counsel represented to me and my colleague who participated in the conference, Thomas J. Finn, that emails were not produced by Defendants because they had either been deleted from Defendants' computer systems or they were not relevant to the instant matter. Defendants' counsel further represented that no attempt was made to recover these deleted emails to determine their potential relevance or responsiveness to Tom James' requests for production. 4. Up until opposing counsel's abrupt refusal to participate in any further

discussions regarding discovery, the parties were involved in ongoing discussions regarding potential access to Defendants' computer database and electronic communications.

___________________________ Paula Cruz Cedillo

Signed and sworn to before me on this 2nd day of February, 2004.

______________________________ Commissioner of the Superior Court

510402

-2­
One Goodwin Square 225 Asylum Street Hartford, CT 06103

HALLORAN & SAGE LLP

Phone (860) 522-6103 Fax (860) 548-0006 Juris No. 26105