Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

I l ‘ _ W Case 3:03-cv-O059?§BA Document 58 Filed 01/ SEIBOO4 Page
I
I 1** l - lj}
I ZF J II`}? I
I UNITED STATES DISTRICT COU * I
I DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
I TOM JAMES COMPANY, · LU/KJ I
I eiaamsrr, ; I I
I TRACE APPAREL LLC and I
I J. TRACY GREEN, :
I / Defendants. JANU Y 27, 2004 I
gg? MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO REPLY TO DEFE ANTS’ ME ORANDUM I
‘ IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO COMPEL ELECT NIC DISCO .ERY `
Pursuant to Rule 7(b) of the Local Civil Rules of the U ed States District Court I
‘ ?for the District of Connecticut, the plaintiff, Tom James Com y ("Tom James"),
giereby moves this Court for an extension of time in which to ~ a reply to the
I E-adefendants, Trace Apparel LLC and J. Tracy Green’s ("Defe I ants"), Memorandum in
gg;-gl CI? pposition to Motion to Compel Electronic Discovery, dated nuary 13, 2004
mz( *`("Oppositiqn Memorandum"), of three (3) days, up to and incl ing February2, 2004. I
cause for the requested extension oftime, T James submits that,
de-spiteI'its'diIi‘gence In preparing a reply to Defendants' Opp . ion Memorandum, the
aidditional ti`me*·,is necessary to respond fully and properly tot ==i issues set forth therein. I
`·II I I
Tom James needs the additional time requested in order to a • quately evaluate and I
analyze its position regarding the Opposition Memorandum. I I
O“° G°°‘I‘"I" S°I"II"° HALLORAN Phone (soo) 522-6103 I
i?.i,tFtl?L%`TII?fi3 si SAGE up lE‘$.I%’£I22ii“£°°° I
_________ i