Free Order on Motion for Conference - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

N E N , Case- ( ““é.C·"""*‘§`·
~ I if ‘ I ’‘`‘ I» ‘‘’‘ . I . N
‘ p Q` I V ’ "·¢
.»$,.
N L gl it _,/ .- ,.,A ., _.__W }. _ _ N
N 6 N;
— · 2* ., 3; 5.;*
I . II; I _ _ (_ _, _, l
N 0 5 liiit ll Q3 :.$€= I"?} ‘l,é;I N
I '¤ Q g UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. iis;. I I;;I:’I ,IrI—I;I
E tg DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT Iii- >· IIA ~£ 4 N
¤ -. I
III 2 ~_`~
B uf TOM JAMES COMPANY, Y CIVIL ACTION N0.
rn Ln ¤ ·
5 E $ H PLAINTIFF 3:03cv00596 (JBA) E ;( ,-E . I N
I 0} cn III »
3 A I vs I
fj ,3, JI: '
ID 0
F E °' J. TRACY GREEN, ETAL. N
N u ‘ December 17, 2003
tm ur DEFENDANTS ` I N
-·—I
Ӥ
»—I . I
I —rI .¤ .
I IH 0
N QI, _ “
gd ·-I
N 37*3 Pursuant to the Court’s standing order, the defendant J. Tracy Green
IZ}
O w ' H H
N ·§_ SA (hereinafter, Green ) hereby requests that the court schedule a pre-filing
·—I H
N if g conference. Green desires to submit a partial motion forjudgment on the pleadings
U
fj 2 pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. R. Rule 12 (c), and requests a conference to discuss the
-•J
N g lg proposed filing.
0 ··-I
SE On May 19, 2003, the plaintiff Tom James Company (hereinafter, "Tom N
:2 -·-I
${3,- James") filed an Amended Verified Complaint [Doc. No. 4]. That document
II-I cu
cz .c: I
8 Z contained seven counts, the second of which claimed relief based upon an alleged
°‘ ° I stir _
g § bretafch f0f,_an agreement not to compete. See, Amended Verified Complaint, May
¤·· I in ;Z- -;
III E` EI I {Q} . ·
rr I-I ; II ‘··* 3 ;
DI 0 · { ‘
In I· ""‘II · A a·
H +, I, ·•-svn, C I.
,3 ¤¥ ____“ fs
q . . C"h?`* i` ` ·=1.:
.2 E: Q F}? *1.5
+3 nl Q Y-JJ,) l"
0 til
2 2 Q -'l- N
.. I; °
2 Is 8 N
‘·~·` nt I
GI . cn
$1 as H N
cv 0 H
·—I N I-I