Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

E ~#~ —
N" M • se 3:03-cv-00571-SRU Document 23 Filed 12/16/2003 Page 1 0P>`C1}$"')]**`\'\—£ lvm
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT J ji EF PY
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT " " "' A ` " U
i ,»- l (Bridgeport) ____ _
1 Kill} ll-{I ~ 5 l—-`-’ l2Z= 0 5
N >l=>l<=I=>l=>l<>l<¤l==l=*=l<>l<>l==l==l<=t=>l<>l<=l<=l<>I=>l<>!<>l¢=l==l<=l<>l=>l<=i<=·l==t=>l¢=l==l==l=>l<=l<>I<>l=>l¢>|=
N JANE DOE, JR., ppa Jane Doe, Sr. * Q}; . 2 , 3 p .
N VS. * 3:03 CV 571 (SRU)VYL<’/
I- =l= ~·~33 a
i PHILIP GIORDANO, ET AL. * DECEMBER
N =Z=>l=*=l<=l==l¢=l=>l=>l¢>l=>l=¥l<>l==l==l=>l<>l<>!<>k*=l<=l=>l<>k=£<>k=l<>k*=l=>l=>l<>l<=I<>l<=l<>k=l==i==i<=I< ` N
1 E PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO REPLY TO THE N
Q DEFENDANT WATERBURY’S MOTION TO DISMISS N
;
N cj; The plaintiffs herein entreat this Court to grant them an extension of time of thirty (3 0) N
r 7 3 3 l
Q N days subsequent to this Court’s ruling upon the State of Connecticut’s Motion to intervene, N
N E N " ` i I a
E ( within which to reply to Waterbury’s Motion to Dismiss. Given the fact that this Court, on
H December 22, 2003, might very well grant Connecticut’s motion to intervene; it appears to the
$1 · DiEdersig*ned that it is premature for plaintift`s’ legal team to take on the responsibility of
Q [ responding before they know whether or not they will continue in that stead.
l
\ RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
` JANE DOE, SR. PPA JANE DOE, JR. N
N THE PLA »» IFF `
3 _ ,»»’ ‘ / Q
,1 BY: - N
Q TTY. ERSKI E D. I cl ' OSH N
fx FEDERAL BAR NO CT 9743
_ jg THE LAW OFFIC S OF ERSKINE D. McINTOSH, P.C. ;
` E 3129 WHITNEY · ENUE, SECOND FLOOR N
I- - HAMDEN, CON . 06518-2364 =
I (203) 787-9994 `
i COUNSEL FOR THE PLAINTIFF · N
if 1 A
3 l
l
3 2; 3- 2;- 3 3-- 2;- 3 2; LA 3 2;-- 3 22;- 3 3- 2;- 2;- 3 2.; 3 3 2-.-.-32
3- 2Q 3 2; 3- 3 2; 3- 2; 2;-- 3 2; 3- 22; 3- 2;- 3 2; 2; 3-- 2;- 3 3-- 2;.- -2;.-