Free Probation Form 12 - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

_ 22 ..._......_ .-..._._........._ -—.-·-.......t..L..,,__.... ~...-..Y...2. I
. I
I F°"" 12 Case 3:03-cr-00110-SRU Document 40 Filed O2/16/2006 Page 1 of 1
I UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
U.S.A. vs. LEE Jur¤ri~rA Docket N¥;3:%CFIQOIIlI§(SRU) I
._.II;, Lam EI-`°#I
PETITION ON PROBATION AND SUPERVISED RELEASE I
. . II Oli 2b I
COMES NOW Brendon ll/l. Prerpaolr, PROBATION OFFICER OF THE CO1IlEtrTI&&sIa· trn an official report upon the I
conduct and attitude of Lee Jupina who was sentenced to 28 months prison for a violation of 18 C. § 1001, False _
Statements, bythe Honorable Stefan R. Underhill, United States District Judge sittingyin {lj1%I¢liirli®tIIa{@rIi . port, Connecticut I
on October 27, 2003, who fixed the period of supervision at 3 years which commenIcetjIgrn}SettféFt1t:lIéP 3;*2005 and imposed I
I the general terms and conditions theretofore adopted by the court and also imposed special conditions and terms as follows: J
The defendant shall participate in a program for substance abuse treatment, either inpatient or outpatient, approved of by the I
U.S. Probation Office, which shall include testing. The defendant shall pay all or a portion of the cost of treatment, based on I
I his ability to pay, in an amount determined by the probation office.
Since his release on September 8, 2005, the defendant’s term of supervised release has been running concurrently with a term
of Connecticut State Parole. I
RESPECTFULLY PRESENTING PETITION FOR ACTION OF COURT AND FOR CAUSE AS FOLLOWS: .
The defendant is being cited for violating the following conditions of supervised release: I
. I
Charge # 1: Special Condition - "The defendant shall participate in a program for substance abuse treatment, either inpatient
or outpatient, approved of by the U.S. Probation Qffice, which shall include testing. The defendant shall pay all or a portion
of the cost of treatment, based on his ability to pay, in an amount determined bythe probation office." After rendering a positive ‘
urine sample in September 2005, Mr. Jupina began intensive outpatient substance abuse treatment at IVICCA in Danbury,
Connecticut in October 2005. On November 30, 2005, IVlr. Jupina was unsuccessfully discharged from the IVICCA treatment
program as a result of failing to attend treatment on three occasions, rendering three urine samples which tested positive for I
cocaine, and refusing to provide a urine sample. In December 2005, Mr. Jupina was referred to inpatient treatment at
Crossroads in New Haven, Connecticut. He was scheduled to begin treatment on January 3, 2006, but he failed to report.
Charge # 2: Standard Condition - "The defendant shall refrain from the use of alcohol and shall not rchase ossess use
distribute, or administer any controlled substance, or any paraphernalia related to any controlled substance, except as I
prescribed by a physician" Since September 2005, Mr. Jupina has tested positive for cocaine on seven occasions. I
Charge it 3: Standard Condition - "T he defendant shall notify the probation officer within 72 hours of any change in residence I
or employment? Mr. Jupina was last seen by the probation officer on December 13, 2005. His last telephone contact with
the Probation Office was January 3, 2006. On February 7, 2006, the probation office was informed that Mr. Jupina has not
resided at his last known address since late December 2005. Mr. Jupina’s current whereabouts are unknown.
Charge # 4: Standard Condition — "The defendant shall answer truthfully all inguiries by the probation officer and follow the I
instructions of the probation officer." it/lr. Jupina was instructed to report to the Probation Office or the State Parole Office on I
January 10, 2006. He failed to comply with these instructions. As a result a remand and an absconder warrant was issued I
by State Parole on January 15, 2006. I
PRAYING 'THAT THE COURT WILL ORDER a warrant to issue with the period of supervision tolled. I
ORDER OF COURT Sworn · y .
Considered and ordered this —f..—_2...2_2,.. .-Q-'4 - · -/ _ 2 2 is
day of February, 2006 and ordered filed and made P Brendon M. P rpaoli
a part of the records is *'··· ·‘*····· no- United States Probation Officer

4 ,, . - -..z Place
Stefan . Underhill . __I_ . . _ /5 "
United States District Ju Jag I Q _I Date
x. `·.•vL¤ » ..2:.; I I V M
Before me, the Honorabk·D8l5b.rUBtGJ ' ' trict Judge, on thief day of February, 2006 at Bridgeport,
Connecticut, U.S. Probation Officyzggm ' aoli appeargid and under oath stated that the facts set forth in this petition ~
are true to the best of his knowle g Id I -·Ij Ii. `-,' `*
. W .Itl 2. W2 2... - 22 2.2% I
II I · Stef R. Underhill I
- I United States District Judge I
I II I I I I I I I I `I“I`III LI II! I; II T i`I I1 IQ
i I.i.

iiier rir: rrr: r W as as ·s as
II I II I I I I IIII I IIIIIIII II f - IQ? sI II·*III$~¥ Ii
as ssa 2.·2i;;I-_;gg- _e:_sI